<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux in Healthcare</title>
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3215/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: kmdennis</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3215/#comment-2385</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3215/#comment-2385</guid>
					<description>What is ti they are looking for in the open source that does not exist, that exist in the MS world. So far I can see almost all the equivalents: Office Suite, Database/SQL, Web, Encryption, Server, Desktops, Browsers etc. I would love to know what they want in order to start the adoption process so I can get a group of software developers to work on a product(s) that will be ready in 5 years and make it 20-30 year stable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is ti they are looking for in the open source that does not exist, that exist in the MS world. So far I can see almost all the equivalents: Office Suite, Database/SQL, Web, Encryption, Server, Desktops, Browsers etc. I would love to know what they want in order to start the adoption process so I can get a group of software developers to work on a product(s) that will be ready in 5 years and make it 20-30 year stable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Free Software Far Ahead of Proprietary Software in Medical World?</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3215/#comment-2135</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3215/#comment-2135</guid>
					<description>[...] http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3215/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3215/" rel="nofollow">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3215/</a> [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cyberten &#187; Blog Archive &#187; President Obama: Good for Open Source?</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3215/#comment-1996</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3215/#comment-1996</guid>
					<description>[...] There is an ongoing debate concerning the maturity of EHR standards. For example, when we wrote an article on Linux and open source in healthcare in 2007, we couldn’t get the US’s largest healthcare technology provider to even talk on the record about standards, saying the discussion would be premature. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There is an ongoing debate concerning the maturity of EHR standards. For example, when we wrote an article on Linux and open source in healthcare in 2007, we couldn’t get the US’s largest healthcare technology provider to even talk on the record about standards, saying the discussion would be premature. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
