http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3670/ Open Source, Open Standards Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:35:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3670/#comment-203 Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:07:25 +0000 http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3670/#comment-203 one thing about quanta is that you can really customize the way you work, and it doesn't overpower you with features and bloat. Its the right combination of what you need and what you want. It also doesn't hinder you if you want to write great code. DW is a great big behemoth of a program, but in the end is still not more effective in the end. Vim on the otherhand has too high of a learning curve for one who wants to do html and all the things that you have to know to make it equivalent to the things that Quanta does is generally far too much to make it preferable. Very powerful, but not very many people want to go through thousands of hours of documentation, experimentation and research to get it on and poppin? one thing about quanta is that you can really customize the way you work, and it doesn’t overpower you with features and bloat. Its the right combination of what you need and what you want. It also doesn’t hinder you if you want to write great code. DW is a great big behemoth of a program, but in the end is still not more effective in the end.
Vim on the otherhand has too high of a learning curve for one who wants to do html and all the things that you have to know to make it equivalent to the things that Quanta does is generally far too much to make it preferable. Very powerful, but not very many people want to go through thousands of hours of documentation, experimentation and research to get it on and poppin?

]]> http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3670/#comment-178 Sun, 08 Jul 2007 22:11:00 +0000 http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3670/#comment-178 Quanta has done well to be such a great editor (particularly on Linux) but it's still not quite as friendly or appealing as Dreamweaver. There are some really nice features such as variable name completion which i'd love to see on DW but Quanta's Wysiwgy interface and code interface still don't gel anywhere as nice. Quanta has done well to be such a great editor (particularly on Linux) but it’s still not quite as friendly or appealing as Dreamweaver. There are some really nice features such as variable name completion which i’d love to see on DW but Quanta’s Wysiwgy interface and code interface still don’t gel anywhere as nice.

]]> http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3670/#comment-177 Sun, 08 Jul 2007 06:20:11 +0000 http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3670/#comment-177 vim works just fine. vim works just fine.

]]>