GNU Public License(GPL)version 2, GPLv3, BSD, Eclipse Public License, Common Public License, Apache Software License, Mozilla Public License, project contributor agreement, starting an open source project, subscription agreement — these are just a few of the issues facing individuals and companies that develop, distribute, and use free and open source software. It’s a complicated world, and competent, experienced counsel is essential.
The topic for this month’s “On the Docket” came to mind because I retired from Red Hat at the end of August. It got me thinking about those attorneys in private practice that I’ve recommended to open source projects, companies, and contributors over the years. Some of the lawyers were collaborators; others appeared with me on conference panels; and still others were opposing counsel. Each has earned my respect. So, here is my list in no particular order. (To the extent I have missed a worthy candidate, my apologies.)
*Eben Moglen, Dan Ravicher, Richard Fontana, The Software Freedom Law Center, New York, New York. The Software Freedom Law Center is the place for developers to get advice. The SFLC runs educational programs for both in-house and outside counsel on open source licensing, including its Open Source Law Immersion Program. Eben is exceptional with customers, helping managers understand open source issues. Although Eben is returning to teaching at Columbia this fall, he will still be involved with SFLC. Dan and Richard are both patent attorneys. Dan is the founder of the Public Patent Foundation, which has successfully challenged a…
Please log in to view this content.
Not Yet a Member?
Register with LinuxMagazine.com and get free access to the entire archive, including:
