<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case for Ruby on Rails</title>
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4063/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Bryan Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4063/#comment-305</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4063/#comment-305</guid>
					<description>Yeah, I thought it was a good overview of the business drivers for using RoR over something else or "going it alone" without a framework. 

I'm going to give "privacy registrations suck" the benefit of this doubt on this one and imagine that he/she was just channeling the frustrations of any Rails developer that get tripped up from time-to-time trying to build a truly great web app on a framework that's a bit under-documented and short on real-world OSS examples. 

It's something I can relate to; I took a break from reading the Rails source to toss off this comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I thought it was a good overview of the business drivers for using RoR over something else or &#8220;going it alone&#8221; without a framework. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to give &#8220;privacy registrations suck&#8221; the benefit of this doubt on this one and imagine that he/she was just channeling the frustrations of any Rails developer that get tripped up from time-to-time trying to build a truly great web app on a framework that&#8217;s a bit under-documented and short on real-world OSS examples. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s something I can relate to; I took a break from reading the Rails source to toss off this comment.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dangarrett</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4063/#comment-304</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 04:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4063/#comment-304</guid>
					<description>you're right, not a single line.  but *all* of the source code is available on sourceforge.  please read all of the words in the article before proclaiming suckage.  dip weed. 
 
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=173226  
 
besides, the article reviews solid business reasons for implementing RoR.  i'm pretty sure it wasn't presented as a review of the language or framework.  to that end it's precisely the sort of information opensource needs in the marketplace to push beyond "just LAMP". 

dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re right, not a single line.  but *all* of the source code is available on sourceforge.  please read all of the words in the article before proclaiming suckage.  dip weed. </p>
<p><a href="http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=173226" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=173226</a>  </p>
<p>besides, the article reviews solid business reasons for implementing RoR.  i&#8217;m pretty sure it wasn&#8217;t presented as a review of the language or framework.  to that end it&#8217;s precisely the sort of information opensource needs in the marketplace to push beyond &#8220;just LAMP&#8221;. </p>
<p>dan
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: privacy registrations suck</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4063/#comment-301</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4063/#comment-301</guid>
					<description>An entire article about Ruby on Rails and not a single line of code?

This place sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An entire article about Ruby on Rails and not a single line of code?</p>
<p>This place sucks.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
