Sun: Let My Office Suite Go!

Nearly a year ago I took a shot in the dark predicting improvements in OpenOffice.org thanks to the Microsoft/Novell alliance, and Novell releasing a solid Evolution for Windows, as well as a Windows version of the Novell build of OpenOffice.org, with improved filters and usability features. About half of it came true.

Nearly a year ago in this column (December 2006, “Penguin Prophecies“) I made a prediction that was essentially a shot in the dark: “in 2007, OpenOffice.org (OOo) gets even better with the Microsoft/Novell alliance, and Novell will release a solid Evolution for Windows, as well as a Windows version of the Novell build of OpenOffice.org, with improved filters and usability features. The releases cause a ripple, paving the way for Linux desktop use and acclimating end-users with an alternative productivity platform.”

Okay, I don’t fashion myself as some sort of overweight open source Nostradamus from New Jersey, but half of that prediction came true. The Windows port of Evolution, released in the summer of 2006, is still very buggy, and an installable release hasn’t been updated in nine months as of this writing. However, back in October, the Novell build of OpenOffice.org, under the auspices of Go-OO.org (a Novell sponsored Web site) was also released, on both Linux and Windows. The thing is, it just didn’t happen for the reasons I thought it would.

See, I thought Novell was going to do this just for the sake of competing with Sun, and for providing an alternative version for people who wanted it. As it turned out, it was done because Sun, who fully controls the OpenOffice.org project, didn’t want to accept Novell’s Linear Model Solver code for Calc, which is released under the Lesser GNU General Public License (LGPL) — the same license OpenOffice.org is licensed under. Sun then wanted to re-implement the Novell coder’s two years of hard work for no logical reason.

As it turns out, there’s a whole bunch of other code and modifications that Novell released under LGPL that Sun hasn’t accepted into OOo — so Novell decided to release its own version that it packages with SLED 10 and maintain its own Web site and community for it. In other words, a fork.

All of this could have been avoided if OpenOffice.org was run like a true community concern and became a Not-For-Profit foundation, much like its brethren at Debian, Apache, and Eclipse.

It’s even more important that this be done now, because IBM has committed programmers to OpenOffice.org, and will be using OOo code as the basis of its Lotus Symphony product. Only a true not-for-profit foundation, which would include an elected board of directors, an advisory board and properly established set of guiding principles and management guidelines, would truly allow all vendors equal access to the project and commits to the upstream source.

While IBM, Sun, and Novell (who is still contributing directly to the project on a best effort basis despite the very public slap in the face) are the only three major vendors involved right now, it’s conceivable there will be more in the future. Who knows? Maybe Apple, HP, or even Microsoft will want to pitch code in, and they too will be at Sun’s mercy until the project is foundational-ized and a rational meritocracy is imposed.

We also need a foundation because of OOo’s increasing dependency on Java. OOo has a lot of Java dependencies, and all signs point to more on the way. At the moment, if you download OpenOffice.org for a fressh install, you need a Java Virtual Machine (JVM). As of the 2.3 release, OOo uses a Java-based installer and requires Java to make its OOo database program work (a requirement since 2.0), among other things. If you don’t have a JVM already installed on your computer, the OpenOffice.org distro is conveniently bundled with Sun’s.

For reasons unknown at the time of this writing, IBM and OpenOffice.org haven’t made IBM’s J9 available as an alternative. And, even though Sun has started releasing Java under the GPLv2, the current Java implementation has quite a way to go until it’s fully “free as in freedom.”

Presumably, one day soon, we’ll see a free JVM. Maybe we’ll see a whole bunch of JVMs, optimized and tweaked by different projects. But, will Sun force us to use their JVM instead? Will IBM be allowed to provide theirs on the OpenOffice.org site? What about all the third party embedded JVMs? With Sun alone pulling the strings at OpenOffice.org, these types of questions will always linger and create friction among the open source community.

Now, I’m no communist. I think that the vendors who put in the most amount of work into open source projects should reap the rewards from their community participation. That’s only fair. Certainly, with StarOffice and Lotus Symphony, both of these products are likely to translate into real dollars for their respective companies.

But, if open source software is really supposed to be free, well, then these vendors not only have to walk the walk and talk the talk just for their own purposes and benefit, but also because of the responsibility they have to the community at large, and that includes open access to large projects such as OpenOffice.org.

Comments on "Sun: Let My Office Suite Go!"


“But, if open source software is really supposed to be free…”

That premise is incorrect.


Another sad story of wasteful and duplicated Linux development.

I’ll add another prediction to Jason’s. As long as there are duplicated toolkits, duplicated desktops, duplicated/forked application, etc, Linux will never become mainstream on the desktop. The users are sheep, abd they want a standard imposed upon them, even if it is inferior. Witness MS’s success.


I don’t see dependencies on Java being any more negative than dependencies on Mono or some other next-generation (in terms of the Linux desktop) platforms (in fact, I see it as a move in the right direction). Java is undergoing a migration path to become GPL free. My belief is that Sun is doing its part to unravel the platform from its less-than-opensource roots. I feel we should be patient because the Java development platform espouses one of the important goals of Linux, compatibility. I think “write once, run anywhere” is a stretch, but at least the software can be compiled on any machine that has a JDK.

What we need to do, as a community, is not to try to tear programs like OpenOffice.org away from Java, but continue to hold (pressure) Sun to their promise of GPL’ing Java…ALL of Java.


Oh, I definitely think Java, paricularly a fully open source and unencumbered one, is a very good thing. See my other column on this matter at:



Sun Microsystems’ OpenOffice.org 2.3.x ?

A friend in need is a friend indeed !

I have JVM on my laptop. I use Java!
I use the OpenOffice.Org 2.3.0 package on and off. It is good but not excellent!

2 pages dedicated for MS Office and Sun OpenOffice initiation.

Hug OpenOffice …

Dan Gheorghe

Heya i am for the first time here. I came across this board and I find It truly useful & it helped me out much. I hope to give something back and aid others like you aided me.

HxnzY7 gzjxalffbfoj, [url=http://zrfexjdtvtgj.com/]zrfexjdtvtgj[/url], [link=http://exlnsggbhrmc.com/]exlnsggbhrmc[/link], http://xbpiigaprunx.com/

Leave a Reply