<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun: Let My Office Suite Go!</title>
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4178/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Gheorghe Somnea</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4178/#comment-545</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4178/#comment-545</guid>
					<description>Sun Microsystems' OpenOffice.org 2.3.x ?

A friend in need is a friend indeed !

I have JVM on my laptop. I use Java! 
I use the OpenOffice.Org 2.3.0 package on and off. It is good but not excellent! 

http://dan.somnea.free.fr/2C/ 
2 pages dedicated for MS Office and Sun OpenOffice initiation.

Hug OpenOffice ...

Dan Gheorghe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun Microsystems&#8217; OpenOffice.org 2.3.x ?</p>
<p>A friend in need is a friend indeed !</p>
<p>I have JVM on my laptop. I use Java!<br />
I use the OpenOffice.Org 2.3.0 package on and off. It is good but not excellent! </p>
<p><a href="http://dan.somnea.free.fr/2C/" rel="nofollow">http://dan.somnea.free.fr/2C/</a><br />
2 pages dedicated for MS Office and Sun OpenOffice initiation.</p>
<p>Hug OpenOffice &#8230;</p>
<p>Dan Gheorghe
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jason Perlow</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4178/#comment-541</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4178/#comment-541</guid>
					<description>Oh, I definitely think Java, paricularly a fully open source and unencumbered one, is a very good thing. See my other column on this matter at:

http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3653/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I definitely think Java, paricularly a fully open source and unencumbered one, is a very good thing. See my other column on this matter at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3653/" rel="nofollow">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/3653/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4178/#comment-540</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4178/#comment-540</guid>
					<description>I don't see dependencies on Java being any more negative than dependencies on Mono or some other next-generation (in terms of the Linux desktop) platforms (in fact, I see it as a move in the right direction). Java is undergoing a migration path to become GPL free. My belief is that Sun is doing its part to unravel the platform from its less-than-opensource roots. I feel we should be patient because the Java development platform espouses one of the important goals of Linux, compatibility. I think "write once, run anywhere" is a stretch, but at least the software can be compiled on any machine that has a JDK.

What we need to do, as a community, is not to try to tear programs like OpenOffice.org away from Java, but continue to hold (pressure) Sun to their promise of GPL'ing Java...ALL of Java.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see dependencies on Java being any more negative than dependencies on Mono or some other next-generation (in terms of the Linux desktop) platforms (in fact, I see it as a move in the right direction). Java is undergoing a migration path to become GPL free. My belief is that Sun is doing its part to unravel the platform from its less-than-opensource roots. I feel we should be patient because the Java development platform espouses one of the important goals of Linux, compatibility. I think &#8220;write once, run anywhere&#8221; is a stretch, but at least the software can be compiled on any machine that has a JDK.</p>
<p>What we need to do, as a community, is not to try to tear programs like OpenOffice.org away from Java, but continue to hold (pressure) Sun to their promise of GPL&#8217;ing Java&#8230;ALL of Java.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ppmoore</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4178/#comment-539</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4178/#comment-539</guid>
					<description>Another sad story of wasteful and duplicated Linux development.

I'll add another prediction to Jason's. As long as there are duplicated toolkits, duplicated desktops, duplicated/forked application, etc, Linux will never become mainstream on the desktop. The users are sheep, abd they want a standard imposed upon them, even if it is inferior. Witness MS's success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another sad story of wasteful and duplicated Linux development.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll add another prediction to Jason&#8217;s. As long as there are duplicated toolkits, duplicated desktops, duplicated/forked application, etc, Linux will never become mainstream on the desktop. The users are sheep, abd they want a standard imposed upon them, even if it is inferior. Witness MS&#8217;s success.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: briceg</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4178/#comment-538</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4178/#comment-538</guid>
					<description>"But, if open source software is really supposed to be free..."

That premise is incorrect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But, if open source software is really supposed to be free&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>That premise is incorrect.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
