<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is 2008 the Year of the Linux Desktop?</title>
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 23:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: jonnicc</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-951</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-951</guid>
					<description>I switched to Ubuntu on January 4, 2008, and I haven't looked back. I can do almost everything a Windoze computer can do, sans iTunes. I'm sure there will be a port of iTunes to Linux soon, as everybody in the industry is going digital. I can count on my extensive family of Ubuntu programmers out in cyberspace to come up with the solutions that we all want. Apple needs to start thinking about the rest of us. They need to either open-source their OS &#38; Apps, or stay at 3%. The price of their premium system, is twice to three times the price of a comparative Dell, HP or dare I say, Lenovo system, and OS X is UNIX! Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron is going to be a big deal. With Gutsy Gibbon 7.10, I have tried to get all of those who would want to switch, to try it. Those who don't, are either serious gamesters, or Multimedia hounds that need to download MP3's from iTunes or Urge. I have had a great experience with Ubuntu Linux, and I am sticking with it! The real competition in Linux will begin when Open SUSE 11 comes out! Then it's going to be a real fight in the Linux world over the best desktop around! because of its stability, I'm puttin' my dough on Ubuntu 8.04.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I switched to Ubuntu on January 4, 2008, and I haven&#8217;t looked back. I can do almost everything a Windoze computer can do, sans iTunes. I&#8217;m sure there will be a port of iTunes to Linux soon, as everybody in the industry is going digital. I can count on my extensive family of Ubuntu programmers out in cyberspace to come up with the solutions that we all want. Apple needs to start thinking about the rest of us. They need to either open-source their OS &amp; Apps, or stay at 3%. The price of their premium system, is twice to three times the price of a comparative Dell, HP or dare I say, Lenovo system, and OS X is UNIX! Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron is going to be a big deal. With Gutsy Gibbon 7.10, I have tried to get all of those who would want to switch, to try it. Those who don&#8217;t, are either serious gamesters, or Multimedia hounds that need to download MP3&#8217;s from iTunes or Urge. I have had a great experience with Ubuntu Linux, and I am sticking with it! The real competition in Linux will begin when Open SUSE 11 comes out! Then it&#8217;s going to be a real fight in the Linux world over the best desktop around! because of its stability, I&#8217;m puttin&#8217; my dough on Ubuntu 8.04.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hacklinuxdude</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-939</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-939</guid>
					<description>I have already switch few months back to Ubuntu at my home and office machine and its surprisingly more easy (no virus,spyware, boltware, etc).

I made a decision that I am going to use Linux from now on and removed all Microsoft crap from my machine. Took a month to get used to but finally done. I am enjoying this :) No more boltware. Machine is working as it is after months of heavy usage - no sign of slowdown :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have already switch few months back to Ubuntu at my home and office machine and its surprisingly more easy (no virus,spyware, boltware, etc).</p>
<p>I made a decision that I am going to use Linux from now on and removed all Microsoft crap from my machine. Took a month to get used to but finally done. I am enjoying this :) No more boltware. Machine is working as it is after months of heavy usage - no sign of slowdown :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Gheorghe Somnea</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-628</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-628</guid>
					<description>Hello,
An American proverb says: 
"The grass is always greener on the other side."

2008 could be the Linux' happy year as it has reserved the green grass of a land. 

A condition has to be mentioned:
Both Linux and Windows were created for the same newbies. 
In Romania, Linux-based servers are popular. Teenagers "eat" Linux, bread and ... edulcorates.
Windows or Linux, this is the "en-vogue" question !
A French proverb:
"L'herbe est toujours plus verte chez le voisin."
Meaning:  'The grass is always greener at the neighbours.'
Sincerely yours,
Dan Gheorghe
http://dansomnea.tripod.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
An American proverb says:<br />
&#8220;The grass is always greener on the other side.&#8221;</p>
<p>2008 could be the Linux&#8217; happy year as it has reserved the green grass of a land. </p>
<p>A condition has to be mentioned:<br />
Both Linux and Windows were created for the same newbies.<br />
In Romania, Linux-based servers are popular. Teenagers &#8220;eat&#8221; Linux, bread and &#8230; edulcorates.<br />
Windows or Linux, this is the &#8220;en-vogue&#8221; question !<br />
A French proverb:<br />
&#8220;L&#8217;herbe est toujours plus verte chez le voisin.&#8221;<br />
Meaning:  &#8216;The grass is always greener at the neighbours.&#8217;<br />
Sincerely yours,<br />
Dan Gheorghe<br />
<a href="http://dansomnea.tripod.com/" rel="nofollow">http://dansomnea.tripod.com/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Krishna Srikanth</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-614</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-614</guid>
					<description>Plus. Windows is the first popular desktop. Even than Mac. Obviously users try to compare other os' features with the ones they experienced in windows. Like games, softwares and especially drivers. 

In windows, there is a rare chance that users need to go to command line. But in linux, still command line rules the OS.So first preference to make linux on desktop should be devoted in developing GUIs for almost all of the functionalities.

Though linux can be accepted at workstation desktop, it might take some (may be long) time to replace home desktop. As I said, Multimedia, Gaming and device drivers are a big concerns.

I agree with Satheesh babu. Though unix studies are in universities, schools and colleges still depend on windows because their softwares are still in win. even c, c++ and java are taught on windows.

Ok. I had enough of views declared. Let me tell you that i have taken my first step in taking linux to home desktop. I installed ubuntu 7.10 on my home sys (dual boot) and will try to survive in that. I would also like to participate in ubuntu development, not as a developer, but as a frontend user and articulating what is needed further. 

Manda Krishna Srikanth
&lt;a href="http://www.krishnasrikanth.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.krishnasrikanth.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plus. Windows is the first popular desktop. Even than Mac. Obviously users try to compare other os&#8217; features with the ones they experienced in windows. Like games, softwares and especially drivers. </p>
<p>In windows, there is a rare chance that users need to go to command line. But in linux, still command line rules the OS.So first preference to make linux on desktop should be devoted in developing GUIs for almost all of the functionalities.</p>
<p>Though linux can be accepted at workstation desktop, it might take some (may be long) time to replace home desktop. As I said, Multimedia, Gaming and device drivers are a big concerns.</p>
<p>I agree with Satheesh babu. Though unix studies are in universities, schools and colleges still depend on windows because their softwares are still in win. even c, c++ and java are taught on windows.</p>
<p>Ok. I had enough of views declared. Let me tell you that i have taken my first step in taking linux to home desktop. I installed ubuntu 7.10 on my home sys (dual boot) and will try to survive in that. I would also like to participate in ubuntu development, not as a developer, but as a frontend user and articulating what is needed further. </p>
<p>Manda Krishna Srikanth<br />
<a href="http://www.krishnasrikanth.com/" rel="nofollow">www.krishnasrikanth.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: satheesh babu</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-613</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-613</guid>
					<description>I have been using Linux for over 8 years now, along with windows. IMHO, possibly the only way Linux can get accepted by the masses is through schools. Windows is THE system as far as the current generation of general public is concerned. All sorts of valid reasons are there which goes for it or against it, but Windows is THE ONE, right now. For another OS to get accepted, it should get injected into the society seemlessly, unnoticed (as hhemken pointed out) and as i see it that can happen only over a generation or two, that too if it is injected through the schools. People SIMPLY RESIST CHANGE (or they are made to), especially with systems/machines/toys that we want to use quickly, and we expect no fuss to get created, and it doesn't help to know that i'm an odd one out using Linux than Windows. Its wonderful that Linux runs most of the embedded gadgets these days, but the point is that the user doesn't need to interface directly with the OS in those systems and hence they don't notice. We need to create a generation which is aware 
    - that there IS CHOICE; that choice is good
    - that they need not study rocket science to work with alternate OSes, or use the systems running 2-3 alternate OSes
    
Hence I believe that the long term answer lies in schools. Get the kids to work with these systems, get them to love these systems and get them to ask their parents to buy them these systems! And make sure that the apps on Linux keep pace with windows!

Till then dual boot systems might be the best bargain that Linux market can hope for to get a significant footprint.

regards
satheesh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Linux for over 8 years now, along with windows. IMHO, possibly the only way Linux can get accepted by the masses is through schools. Windows is THE system as far as the current generation of general public is concerned. All sorts of valid reasons are there which goes for it or against it, but Windows is THE ONE, right now. For another OS to get accepted, it should get injected into the society seemlessly, unnoticed (as hhemken pointed out) and as i see it that can happen only over a generation or two, that too if it is injected through the schools. People SIMPLY RESIST CHANGE (or they are made to), especially with systems/machines/toys that we want to use quickly, and we expect no fuss to get created, and it doesn&#8217;t help to know that i&#8217;m an odd one out using Linux than Windows. Its wonderful that Linux runs most of the embedded gadgets these days, but the point is that the user doesn&#8217;t need to interface directly with the OS in those systems and hence they don&#8217;t notice. We need to create a generation which is aware<br />
    - that there IS CHOICE; that choice is good<br />
    - that they need not study rocket science to work with alternate OSes, or use the systems running 2-3 alternate OSes</p>
<p>Hence I believe that the long term answer lies in schools. Get the kids to work with these systems, get them to love these systems and get them to ask their parents to buy them these systems! And make sure that the apps on Linux keep pace with windows!</p>
<p>Till then dual boot systems might be the best bargain that Linux market can hope for to get a significant footprint.</p>
<p>regards<br />
satheesh
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Krishna Srikanth</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-612</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-612</guid>
					<description>Great people with great thoughts. But in these comments, the people speaking against linux are getting negative points against their names. I wonder why that happens. 

Ok let me tell you my linux experience. People, who told many good things about ubuntu made me download 7.10 a whole day. Later i burnt it on cd and restarted as the live cd.

1st restart - It was fine. I was able to see the desktop with all those window effects as in vista. I thought to install it, so restarted in windows and made some freespace and went back to ubuntu

2nd restart - this time i was not able to get the screen. Some strange color dots were displayed. So i restarted in safe graphics mode

3rd restart - this time i was able to login. i started to install. but in step 2/7 i found a bug. I am in India/Calcutta time zone, but my sys time was shown as african time, and changing timezone changed my sys time. 

Laptop:- I have HP Pavilion, dv6516 with vista, and tried to run as live cd. But speakers, altec's one, were not recognized, it was so calm. I could not dare to install ubuntu on that and loose vista on the whole. so went back to windows.

Manda Krishna Srikanth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great people with great thoughts. But in these comments, the people speaking against linux are getting negative points against their names. I wonder why that happens. </p>
<p>Ok let me tell you my linux experience. People, who told many good things about ubuntu made me download 7.10 a whole day. Later i burnt it on cd and restarted as the live cd.</p>
<p>1st restart - It was fine. I was able to see the desktop with all those window effects as in vista. I thought to install it, so restarted in windows and made some freespace and went back to ubuntu</p>
<p>2nd restart - this time i was not able to get the screen. Some strange color dots were displayed. So i restarted in safe graphics mode</p>
<p>3rd restart - this time i was able to login. i started to install. but in step 2/7 i found a bug. I am in India/Calcutta time zone, but my sys time was shown as african time, and changing timezone changed my sys time. </p>
<p>Laptop:- I have HP Pavilion, dv6516 with vista, and tried to run as live cd. But speakers, altec&#8217;s one, were not recognized, it was so calm. I could not dare to install ubuntu on that and loose vista on the whole. so went back to windows.</p>
<p>Manda Krishna Srikanth
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: b s</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-610</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-610</guid>
					<description>Hi, I'm from Sweden and the main reason I'm still stuck to MS are among several:

1. Some media outlets have web-TV apps that requires a mixture of QuickTime, Windows Media Player and IE to work !!!

2. I use an excellent translationprogram called Babylon. It works by middle button clicking a word and a translation pops up in a sec. The greatest advantage is that if u have an idiom it "scans" to the right and left of the word and if it finds the word being part of an idiom it is translated !! Also they have a marvelous development tool to create your own vocabularies. Hitherto they have refused to port their app to Linux.

3. I'm using Skype and the Linux-version is substandard. Also so called Skaypecasts do not work.

4. The web cams I have, have no driver support for Linux.

These are the main issues intuitively forcing me to my MS partition instead of my Ubuntu partition every time I log on !!!!

Regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m from Sweden and the main reason I&#8217;m still stuck to MS are among several:</p>
<p>1. Some media outlets have web-TV apps that requires a mixture of QuickTime, Windows Media Player and IE to work !!!</p>
<p>2. I use an excellent translationprogram called Babylon. It works by middle button clicking a word and a translation pops up in a sec. The greatest advantage is that if u have an idiom it &#8220;scans&#8221; to the right and left of the word and if it finds the word being part of an idiom it is translated !! Also they have a marvelous development tool to create your own vocabularies. Hitherto they have refused to port their app to Linux.</p>
<p>3. I&#8217;m using Skype and the Linux-version is substandard. Also so called Skaypecasts do not work.</p>
<p>4. The web cams I have, have no driver support for Linux.</p>
<p>These are the main issues intuitively forcing me to my MS partition instead of my Ubuntu partition every time I log on !!!!</p>
<p>Regards!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-609</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 05:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-609</guid>
					<description>The Gong Show known as Windows Vista should send people scurrying to other OS platforms.  I am generating remarkable revenue down/up grading Clients new laptops to dual boot Linux and XP and removing Vista altogether. 

People are feed up with being jerked around by MS...(ME is still leaving a bad taste) ... they are not willing to be beta testers any longer....they certainly do not want to pay for the privilege.  

Imagine an organization so arrogant that they expect everyone to purchase a new router/firewall because they re-wrote their TCP-IP stack.  This also requires hardware manufacturers to re-write their firmware.  All this because Vista has fits when confronted with a SPI firewall.  What happened to standards and conventions?  Is MS now writing these?  

I have over the years built Web, Mail, DNS servers using various distributions of Linux... some have run for as long as 5 years through upgrades etc without a reboot.  Try that with an MS server of any sort.  We have replaced numerous NT boxes with Samba Servers.  Users have no idea any thing is different.  Customer server support costs have been reduced as much as 50%.  Linux and Samba are extremely reliable.  

Enough ranting.  

I jumped off the MS train completely three years ago.  My office is Linux based.  I run Slackware...old habits die hard...and Centos.  There is nothing I need to do in my everyday dealings that requires any MS product.  IMHO there is nothing “almost” any small business or home office really needs MS product for unless you require very specialized software ie. Solid Works etc.  For Newbies it is no more difficult than learning MS Windows, Open Office is remarkable, Opera and Firefox are terrific, Evolution and Thunderbird work well.  There is reasonable multimedia support and it is improving daily. 

Linux is ready now depending on the “Distribution” and will only get better with time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gong Show known as Windows Vista should send people scurrying to other OS platforms.  I am generating remarkable revenue down/up grading Clients new laptops to dual boot Linux and XP and removing Vista altogether. </p>
<p>People are feed up with being jerked around by MS&#8230;(ME is still leaving a bad taste) &#8230; they are not willing to be beta testers any longer&#8230;.they certainly do not want to pay for the privilege.  </p>
<p>Imagine an organization so arrogant that they expect everyone to purchase a new router/firewall because they re-wrote their TCP-IP stack.  This also requires hardware manufacturers to re-write their firmware.  All this because Vista has fits when confronted with a SPI firewall.  What happened to standards and conventions?  Is MS now writing these?  </p>
<p>I have over the years built Web, Mail, DNS servers using various distributions of Linux&#8230; some have run for as long as 5 years through upgrades etc without a reboot.  Try that with an MS server of any sort.  We have replaced numerous NT boxes with Samba Servers.  Users have no idea any thing is different.  Customer server support costs have been reduced as much as 50%.  Linux and Samba are extremely reliable.  </p>
<p>Enough ranting.  </p>
<p>I jumped off the MS train completely three years ago.  My office is Linux based.  I run Slackware&#8230;old habits die hard&#8230;and Centos.  There is nothing I need to do in my everyday dealings that requires any MS product.  IMHO there is nothing “almost” any small business or home office really needs MS product for unless you require very specialized software ie. Solid Works etc.  For Newbies it is no more difficult than learning MS Windows, Open Office is remarkable, Opera and Firefox are terrific, Evolution and Thunderbird work well.  There is reasonable multimedia support and it is improving daily. </p>
<p>Linux is ready now depending on the “Distribution” and will only get better with time.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Norm Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-608</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 01:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-608</guid>
					<description>As someone has already mentioned it's the price of hardware that will drive people toward Linux as their desktop.  The cheapest Mac is ~600 and you need to spend at least that much to get a box that Vista won't grind to a halt.  Considering that all most people want to do is email, surf the web, play media, light weight photo manipulation, write letters, maybe a simple budget spread sheet, and printing, a $200-$300 box is plenty (and could probably still be done for less).  Once configured Linux does all of that really well.  The hang up there is in the "once configured".  

Here are the hurdles I see to your average computer illiterate user being happy enough with their Linux box to go brag to their friends about the great deal they got.

1) Linux is not a "free version of Windows" it's another OS.  No one should expect a Linux box to behave like a PC any more than they would expect a Mac to behave like a PC (thank God!).  If you are used to another OS there will be a leaning curve.  If people know this going in they will be less upset when they find it to be so. 

2) Multimedia support.  Yes Linux does do a great job in supporting all kinds of media.  I've yet to run across anything I can't play (something neither windows or OS X can claim) , but I had to spend some time on the web figuring out how to get this to work.  Someone needs to figure out how to get around the legal hurdles for bundling standard media CODECs into the pre-installed commercial Linux boxes. If this has been done mea culpa. I build my own boxes and do my own installs.  I did once pay for a commercial copy of Suse thinking it would come with multimedia support and save me time.  It didn't so I'm assuming the preinstalled boxes don't either.


3) Kernel updates screw up many drivers compiled against the kernel.  On several occasions I have installed a "security" update to the kernel only to have it kill my X server.  Fortunately I keep a copy of Nvidia's shell script in my home dir and can rerun it from the command line.  I've also had kernel security updates kill my LIRC controlled remote, and reak havoc with VM player's ability to see USB devices.  I'm used to this and now know not to install kernel updates (or "security patches") when I won't have a few hours to get things straightened out afterwards.  But I shudder to think of the vapor lock it would cause the average Joe.

4) It is still way too dependent on the command line and hand editing *.conf files.  Now we're starting to approach the power user (hence this is at the bottom of the list), but it's one of my biggest gripes.  It seams like every time I want to start doing something out of the box (like say a home network), every solution I find starts out with "open a command line and type sudo vi /some/ conf/file".  First, stop telling people to use vi.  Anyone who didn't grow up with it is just going to get frustrated with it.  Second, there should be a GUI for that.  Also each distro should bundle all of those GUIs into a single administration application.  Suse does a reasonable job with YaST, but then there's still the KDE admin console (both of which I use for SAMBA along with a third  independent app smb4k and I sill find my self occasionally hand editing smb.conf and fstab to get things set up and mounted.

I don't see any of this as insurmountable, but I'm not sure if it will happen in time to make 2008 "The year of the Linux desktop"

Krishna Srikanth
   The different Linux distros (at least the main ones) all offer different looks and feels but roughly the same functionality in terms of available applications. Find one you like and stick with it a while I'd recommend openSuse or Ubuntu.

Your software installation problems sound like dependency issues.  You generally shouldn't be grabbing and installing individual packages.  You should use a package manager pointed toward full repositories of RPMs to get your software.  The manager will see the other required packages and fetch them from the repository.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone has already mentioned it&#8217;s the price of hardware that will drive people toward Linux as their desktop.  The cheapest Mac is ~600 and you need to spend at least that much to get a box that Vista won&#8217;t grind to a halt.  Considering that all most people want to do is email, surf the web, play media, light weight photo manipulation, write letters, maybe a simple budget spread sheet, and printing, a $200-$300 box is plenty (and could probably still be done for less).  Once configured Linux does all of that really well.  The hang up there is in the &#8220;once configured&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Here are the hurdles I see to your average computer illiterate user being happy enough with their Linux box to go brag to their friends about the great deal they got.</p>
<p>1) Linux is not a &#8220;free version of Windows&#8221; it&#8217;s another OS.  No one should expect a Linux box to behave like a PC any more than they would expect a Mac to behave like a PC (thank God!).  If you are used to another OS there will be a leaning curve.  If people know this going in they will be less upset when they find it to be so. </p>
<p>2) Multimedia support.  Yes Linux does do a great job in supporting all kinds of media.  I&#8217;ve yet to run across anything I can&#8217;t play (something neither windows or OS X can claim) , but I had to spend some time on the web figuring out how to get this to work.  Someone needs to figure out how to get around the legal hurdles for bundling standard media CODECs into the pre-installed commercial Linux boxes. If this has been done mea culpa. I build my own boxes and do my own installs.  I did once pay for a commercial copy of Suse thinking it would come with multimedia support and save me time.  It didn&#8217;t so I&#8217;m assuming the preinstalled boxes don&#8217;t either.</p>
<p>3) Kernel updates screw up many drivers compiled against the kernel.  On several occasions I have installed a &#8220;security&#8221; update to the kernel only to have it kill my X server.  Fortunately I keep a copy of Nvidia&#8217;s shell script in my home dir and can rerun it from the command line.  I&#8217;ve also had kernel security updates kill my LIRC controlled remote, and reak havoc with VM player&#8217;s ability to see USB devices.  I&#8217;m used to this and now know not to install kernel updates (or &#8220;security patches&#8221;) when I won&#8217;t have a few hours to get things straightened out afterwards.  But I shudder to think of the vapor lock it would cause the average Joe.</p>
<p>4) It is still way too dependent on the command line and hand editing *.conf files.  Now we&#8217;re starting to approach the power user (hence this is at the bottom of the list), but it&#8217;s one of my biggest gripes.  It seams like every time I want to start doing something out of the box (like say a home network), every solution I find starts out with &#8220;open a command line and type sudo vi /some/ conf/file&#8221;.  First, stop telling people to use vi.  Anyone who didn&#8217;t grow up with it is just going to get frustrated with it.  Second, there should be a GUI for that.  Also each distro should bundle all of those GUIs into a single administration application.  Suse does a reasonable job with YaST, but then there&#8217;s still the KDE admin console (both of which I use for SAMBA along with a third  independent app smb4k and I sill find my self occasionally hand editing smb.conf and fstab to get things set up and mounted.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any of this as insurmountable, but I&#8217;m not sure if it will happen in time to make 2008 &#8220;The year of the Linux desktop&#8221;</p>
<p>Krishna Srikanth<br />
   The different Linux distros (at least the main ones) all offer different looks and feels but roughly the same functionality in terms of available applications. Find one you like and stick with it a while I&#8217;d recommend openSuse or Ubuntu.</p>
<p>Your software installation problems sound like dependency issues.  You generally shouldn&#8217;t be grabbing and installing individual packages.  You should use a package manager pointed toward full repositories of RPMs to get your software.  The manager will see the other required packages and fetch them from the repository.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Feeney</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-607</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/4357/#comment-607</guid>
					<description>I am finally making the switch to Linux on an old laptop (not too old). I am Running VMware virtual machine to run XP for all my old programs. It seems to work great for me and should be a great bridge to using only linux and it should help shield me from Microsoft's incessant upgrade strategy. XP is the second full version of Windows that I have ever had to purchase myself and I hope that it is my last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am finally making the switch to Linux on an old laptop (not too old). I am Running VMware virtual machine to run XP for all my old programs. It seems to work great for me and should be a great bridge to using only linux and it should help shield me from Microsoft&#8217;s incessant upgrade strategy. XP is the second full version of Windows that I have ever had to purchase myself and I hope that it is my last.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
