<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Functional Stand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6325/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6325/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: guillona</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6325/#comment-5491</link>
		<dc:creator>guillona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6325/#comment-5491</guid>
		<description>I have also had Erlang suggested to me as a potential language for multi-core programming, but I have not yet had the time to sit down and learn the language.  I will be watching your upcoming posts with interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Personally, I have invested my own energy into Threading Building Blocks, which is also open-source and supported by the community.  It removes the idea of a thread or process, and instead provides a task-based view of the world, tasks are then mapped to processors for execution, and a task-stealing algorithm is employed to balance load.  TBB could be a good library upon which a functional approach could be built.  Some of the templates, like the parallel_reduce template remind me of functional programming already.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m curious to see how Erlang solves low-level issues with cache-locality and load balancing... and how well it really scales to a cluster vs. a shared-memory system with many cores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also had Erlang suggested to me as a potential language for multi-core programming, but I have not yet had the time to sit down and learn the language.  I will be watching your upcoming posts with interest.</p>
<p>Personally, I have invested my own energy into Threading Building Blocks, which is also open-source and supported by the community.  It removes the idea of a thread or process, and instead provides a task-based view of the world, tasks are then mapped to processors for execution, and a task-stealing algorithm is employed to balance load.  TBB could be a good library upon which a functional approach could be built.  Some of the templates, like the parallel_reduce template remind me of functional programming already.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to see how Erlang solves low-level issues with cache-locality and load balancing&#8230; and how well it really scales to a cluster vs. a shared-memory system with many cores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raybaq</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6325/#comment-5492</link>
		<dc:creator>raybaq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6325/#comment-5492</guid>
		<description>I too have been wanting to learn Erlang and will be following your column.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Right now though I have been playing with &lt;a href=&quot;http://clojure.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clojure&lt;/a&gt;, which is functional, has built-in support for concurrency AND runs on the JVM.  Have you had a look at it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have been wanting to learn Erlang and will be following your column.</p>
<p>Right now though I have been playing with <a href="http://clojure.org/" rel="nofollow">Clojure</a>, which is functional, has built-in support for concurrency AND runs on the JVM.  Have you had a look at it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>