Comments on: Edit Photos with Picnik http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6332/ Open Source, Open Standards Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:50:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Mac Adobe http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6332/#comment-104153 Mac Adobe Sat, 31 Dec 2011 01:07:12 +0000 http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6332/#comment-104153 Just wish to say your article is as astonishing. The clarity on your post is just nice and that i could suppose you're an expert on this subject. Fine along with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date with coming near near post. Thanks a million and please carry on the gratifying work. Just wish to say your article is as astonishing. The clarity on your post is just nice and that i could suppose you’re an expert on this subject. Fine along with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date with coming near near post. Thanks a million and please carry on the gratifying work.

]]> By: pradeep11 http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6332/#comment-5503 pradeep11 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6332/#comment-5503 io-=== io-===

]]> By: lemuel http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6332/#comment-5504 lemuel Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6332/#comment-5504 i like it... i like it…

]]> By: tee http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6332/#comment-5505 tee Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6332/#comment-5505 I hate Flash!! Well, if I be honest, it looks very good. <br /> But most of its functionality can be done without flash. I hate Flash!! Well, if I be honest, it looks very good.
But most of its functionality can be done without flash.

]]> By: bryanjrichard http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6332/#comment-5506 bryanjrichard Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6332/#comment-5506 Come to think of it I'm a little surprised I haven't seen an Ajax-y version of something like this that offloads the image processing to, say, a PHP/ImageMagick backend. <br /> <br /> Maybe that's what this is doing but an Ajax interface would take some load off the client. Come to think of it I’m a little surprised I haven’t seen an Ajax-y version of something like this that offloads the image processing to, say, a PHP/ImageMagick backend.

Maybe that’s what this is doing but an Ajax interface would take some load off the client.

]]>