<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloud Enabled</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6511/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6511/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: csk317</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6511/#comment-5578</link>
		<dc:creator>csk317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6511/#comment-5578</guid>
		<description>Your forgot about the mesh! Where would computing be without buzz words and acronyms? Platform had an interesting live discussion on this topic at their event last month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your forgot about the mesh! Where would computing be without buzz words and acronyms? Platform had an interesting live discussion on this topic at their event last month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruno.santos</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6511/#comment-5579</link>
		<dc:creator>bruno.santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6511/#comment-5579</guid>
		<description>This &quot;cloud business&quot; sounds to be a low profile concept of HPC, just a neat way to govern various computers into running distributed applications. In other words, don&#039;t bother the client computer with heavy work, just distribute the work over the network to others with more computing/storage power. Which is great, if I want to use a PDA (or just a wrist watch) and access all of my movies, music... and spreadsheets!&lt;br /&gt;
I say this, because if it really was &quot;The Solution for HPC&quot;, it should have a seriously cool name, like: &quot;hurricane enabled&quot;, &quot;typhoon enabled&quot; or &quot;cyclone grid&quot;, or even &quot;gridded thunderstorm(s)&quot; (with overclocking enabled on demand).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Personaly, I would prefer &quot;Moon Enabled&quot;, with really low latency, low temperatures, a whole satellite for storage, sun powered, outer space cooled and... well, no O2 to react with, to create green house effects!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for the CherryPal, seems like the perfect green solution, including the capability of reducing software/media piracy to 0% in their boxes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;cloud business&#8221; sounds to be a low profile concept of HPC, just a neat way to govern various computers into running distributed applications. In other words, don&#8217;t bother the client computer with heavy work, just distribute the work over the network to others with more computing/storage power. Which is great, if I want to use a PDA (or just a wrist watch) and access all of my movies, music&#8230; and spreadsheets!<br />
I say this, because if it really was &#8220;The Solution for HPC&#8221;, it should have a seriously cool name, like: &#8220;hurricane enabled&#8221;, &#8220;typhoon enabled&#8221; or &#8220;cyclone grid&#8221;, or even &#8220;gridded thunderstorm(s)&#8221; (with overclocking enabled on demand).</p>
<p>Personaly, I would prefer &#8220;Moon Enabled&#8221;, with really low latency, low temperatures, a whole satellite for storage, sun powered, outer space cooled and&#8230; well, no O2 to react with, to create green house effects!</p>
<p>As for the CherryPal, seems like the perfect green solution, including the capability of reducing software/media piracy to 0% in their boxes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmattins</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6511/#comment-5580</link>
		<dc:creator>dmattins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6511/#comment-5580</guid>
		<description>Well, would you consider FaceBook cloud-enabled ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It allows you to&lt;br /&gt;
access your data from anywhere&lt;br /&gt;
( via the web ) .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If so then the whole Web is a cloud&lt;br /&gt;
and a cloud just becomes&lt;br /&gt;
an interface that hides where your data is .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But wait , it&#039;s not your data any more ,&lt;br /&gt;
because once you put it into the cloud&lt;br /&gt;
it belongs to FaceBook&lt;br /&gt;
and if you try to get it back&lt;br /&gt;
you get rained out of the cloud .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well , I guess clouds go Microsoft one better:&lt;br /&gt;
- Microsoft owned the programs&lt;br /&gt;
  ( and we only had a license&lt;br /&gt;
    to install them and use them&lt;br /&gt;
    on our own machines&lt;br /&gt;
  ) but we owned the data&lt;br /&gt;
  because we owned the machines&lt;br /&gt;
  that the data was stored on&lt;br /&gt;
- now the cloud owns the programs&lt;br /&gt;
  and the cloud owns the data&lt;br /&gt;
  because the cloud owns the machines&lt;br /&gt;
  that the data is on&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The obvious follow-up question then becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
- who owns the cloud(s) ?&lt;br /&gt;
and now , we are entering: the twilight zone ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, would you consider FaceBook cloud-enabled ?</p>
<p>It allows you to<br />
access your data from anywhere<br />
( via the web ) .</p>
<p>If so then the whole Web is a cloud<br />
and a cloud just becomes<br />
an interface that hides where your data is .</p>
<p>But wait , it&#8217;s not your data any more ,<br />
because once you put it into the cloud<br />
it belongs to FaceBook<br />
and if you try to get it back<br />
you get rained out of the cloud .</p>
<p>Well , I guess clouds go Microsoft one better:<br />
- Microsoft owned the programs<br />
  ( and we only had a license<br />
    to install them and use them<br />
    on our own machines<br />
  ) but we owned the data<br />
  because we owned the machines<br />
  that the data was stored on<br />
- now the cloud owns the programs<br />
  and the cloud owns the data<br />
  because the cloud owns the machines<br />
  that the data is on</p>
<p>The obvious follow-up question then becomes:<br />
- who owns the cloud(s) ?<br />
and now , we are entering: the twilight zone &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>