<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Block Devices: Using Hardware Over a Network</title>
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: tlong</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1833</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1833</guid>
					<description>I've used drbd on NetBSD for a high-availability webserver mirrorset, and it was a royal pain to get up and running, and replication (even over GB ethernet) was slow as molasses.

 NBD seems far easier to get running, and the availability of SMB functionality is a big plus.

 I plan to play with it this weekend...letcha know how it wrings out.

Koredump</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used drbd on NetBSD for a high-availability webserver mirrorset, and it was a royal pain to get up and running, and replication (even over GB ethernet) was slow as molasses.</p>
<p> NBD seems far easier to get running, and the availability of SMB functionality is a big plus.</p>
<p> I plan to play with it this weekend&#8230;letcha know how it wrings out.</p>
<p>Koredump
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: darkflib</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1591</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1591</guid>
					<description>drbd is also worth looking at for network raid...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drbd is also worth looking at for network raid&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Prasad Joshi</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1570</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1570</guid>
					<description>I guess, the present NBD does not have RAID functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess, the present NBD does not have RAID functionality.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mauro tassianri</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1569</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 13:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1569</guid>
					<description>get rid of tcp/ip trouble and overhead. build your own san raid. have a look at aoe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>get rid of tcp/ip trouble and overhead. build your own san raid. have a look at aoe&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pieter Smit</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1567</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1567</guid>
					<description>Could a nbd drive used as a mirror in a raid array with a local drive, as a online backup ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could a nbd drive used as a mirror in a raid array with a local drive, as a online backup ?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dj13241</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1566</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7118/#comment-1566</guid>
					<description>I would like to see an article on NBD versus iSCSI.  Anyone have any comments on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see an article on NBD versus iSCSI.  Anyone have any comments on this?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
