<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Machine Sprawl: What Does It Cost You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7119/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7119/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mysteriousplanet</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7119/#comment-5765</link>
		<dc:creator>mysteriousplanet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7119/#comment-5765</guid>
		<description>If people manage there servers properly then there will be no problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All servers should be treated the same as regards to management. A virtual server is a real server, from a logical perspective, the host server is too, it&#039;s just an application hosting machine.&lt;br /&gt;
People should always keep records of there systems and track the licensing correctly. If they don&#039;t they are not really managing their environment very well, so this is really a complete non-issue, virtual or otherwise makes no difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can&#039;t understand why people seem to fall into the marketing crap of inventory systems when they can do it all for free themselves by just keeping a record of a build when they build or change it... keep a record of the licenses and the hardware setup, even in something as simple as a text file or spreadsheet... it&#039;s not hard and it&#039;s free!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If people manage there servers properly then there will be no problem.</p>
<p>All servers should be treated the same as regards to management. A virtual server is a real server, from a logical perspective, the host server is too, it&#8217;s just an application hosting machine.<br />
People should always keep records of there systems and track the licensing correctly. If they don&#8217;t they are not really managing their environment very well, so this is really a complete non-issue, virtual or otherwise makes no difference.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t understand why people seem to fall into the marketing crap of inventory systems when they can do it all for free themselves by just keeping a record of a build when they build or change it&#8230; keep a record of the licenses and the hardware setup, even in something as simple as a text file or spreadsheet&#8230; it&#8217;s not hard and it&#8217;s free!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khess</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7119/#comment-5766</link>
		<dc:creator>khess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7119/#comment-5766</guid>
		<description>The difference is that when you have physical machines, you can see them, touch them, and inventory them by several different methods: Visually, ping, management application, etc. Virtual machines that are off can&#039;t be inventoried so easily. It&#039;s also easy to remove them from a VM inventory but have them still exist and burning a license.&lt;br /&gt;
VM management is a real problem, especially in larger environments where you have multiple people creating and maintaining them--possibly in different parts of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spreadsheets or text files are not a good solution unless you have only a couple dozen systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference is that when you have physical machines, you can see them, touch them, and inventory them by several different methods: Visually, ping, management application, etc. Virtual machines that are off can&#8217;t be inventoried so easily. It&#8217;s also easy to remove them from a VM inventory but have them still exist and burning a license.<br />
VM management is a real problem, especially in larger environments where you have multiple people creating and maintaining them&#8211;possibly in different parts of the world.</p>
<p>Spreadsheets or text files are not a good solution unless you have only a couple dozen systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>