<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shades of Greylisting</title>
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7165/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Martin Garcia</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7165/#comment-1642</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7165/#comment-1642</guid>
					<description>I use postgrey in conjunction with my postfix and it works like a charm, actually it reduces the spam as is, postgrey and other spam detection techniques as bayesian rules, SPF, RBL, DKIM, do a great job if they are properly configured and tuned for the specific server. Regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use postgrey in conjunction with my postfix and it works like a charm, actually it reduces the spam as is, postgrey and other spam detection techniques as bayesian rules, SPF, RBL, DKIM, do a great job if they are properly configured and tuned for the specific server. Regards!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bsdlinux</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7165/#comment-1628</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7165/#comment-1628</guid>
					<description>In OpenBSD, graylisting is enabled by default via the spamd_grey variable in /etc/rc.conf </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In OpenBSD, graylisting is enabled by default via the spamd_grey variable in /etc/rc.conf
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: harishpillay</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7165/#comment-1626</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7165/#comment-1626</guid>
					<description>I have been running milter-greylist since mid-2006 on a couple of servers I manage and the impact was stunning.  Spam went from whatever it was to nearly zero.  What is crucial from my point of view is the simplicity that makes this work so well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been running milter-greylist since mid-2006 on a couple of servers I manage and the impact was stunning.  Spam went from whatever it was to nearly zero.  What is crucial from my point of view is the simplicity that makes this work so well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ggoodspeed</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7165/#comment-1621</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7165/#comment-1621</guid>
					<description>I've installed milter-greylist on Red Hat servers a couple of times and was tripped up by an unmentioned installation error.  Milter-greylist runs as smmsp and it requires access to /var/milter-greylist.  The installation process does not give the correct permissions to /var/milter-greylist, and the milter does not start.  To fix, change the ownership on this directory:

chown smmsp /var/milter-greylist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve installed milter-greylist on Red Hat servers a couple of times and was tripped up by an unmentioned installation error.  Milter-greylist runs as smmsp and it requires access to /var/milter-greylist.  The installation process does not give the correct permissions to /var/milter-greylist, and the milter does not start.  To fix, change the ownership on this directory:</p>
<p>chown smmsp /var/milter-greylist
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
