<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On-the-fly Encryption with TrueCrypt</title>
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: samil</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-2675</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-2675</guid>
					<description>I did not get it. Why when a partition or a device is encrypted all data is lost??? I might be missing something, but if it means that the existing data residing on the disk can not be encrypted without loss, what is the benefit? 
My company used zecurion for encrypting server data on linux and windows servers(both backup and storage) and the software encrypted all of the existing data without loss. check them out ... http://www.zecurion.com/software-products.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not get it. Why when a partition or a device is encrypted all data is lost??? I might be missing something, but if it means that the existing data residing on the disk can not be encrypted without loss, what is the benefit?<br />
My company used zecurion for encrypting server data on linux and windows servers(both backup and storage) and the software encrypted all of the existing data without loss. check them out &#8230; <a href="http://www.zecurion.com/software-products.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.zecurion.com/software-products.php</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: meeas</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-2184</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-2184</guid>
					<description>Third vote for ENCFS.  And Gerlos, it works on MAC OSX as well.  Just not Windows......  But maybe that will happen once Fuse is fully ported over to Windows.

For everyone else, if you haven't checked it out, you can read more at:

http://www.arg0.net/encfsintro</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Third vote for ENCFS.  And Gerlos, it works on MAC OSX as well.  Just not Windows&#8230;&#8230;  But maybe that will happen once Fuse is fully ported over to Windows.</p>
<p>For everyone else, if you haven&#8217;t checked it out, you can read more at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.arg0.net/encfsintro" rel="nofollow">http://www.arg0.net/encfsintro</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: malcarada</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1820</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1820</guid>
					<description>Truecrypt is a great program but they do not support whole disk encryption in Linux and they support that for Windows users.

This is not the way to go for open source software, encouraging people to use Windows giving them more features on that platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truecrypt is a great program but they do not support whole disk encryption in Linux and they support that for Windows users.</p>
<p>This is not the way to go for open source software, encouraging people to use Windows giving them more features on that platform.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jm_hannon</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1727</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1727</guid>
					<description>(1) What file system did you choose?  I was given a choice of "FAT" or "None".

(2) When I mounted the encrypted file system (via truecrypt) only the root user had ANY access to the files in the container, and I couldn't find a way to change that behavior.  Is there some way to allow others to access the files?

(3) The files in the container are, for practical purposes, unencrypted for the root user (or whoever owns the container).  If my system gets cracked, how does the encryption protect me?

(4) This approach seems to fit the model of a laptop, more than a desktop or server system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1) What file system did you choose?  I was given a choice of &#8220;FAT&#8221; or &#8220;None&#8221;.</p>
<p>(2) When I mounted the encrypted file system (via truecrypt) only the root user had ANY access to the files in the container, and I couldn&#8217;t find a way to change that behavior.  Is there some way to allow others to access the files?</p>
<p>(3) The files in the container are, for practical purposes, unencrypted for the root user (or whoever owns the container).  If my system gets cracked, how does the encryption protect me?</p>
<p>(4) This approach seems to fit the model of a laptop, more than a desktop or server system.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jakub Myszka</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1725</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1725</guid>
					<description>FreeOTFE does something a bit different as far as i can remember. It does not encrypte the file itself but the data about the file in the MFT or FAT table... It is waaay faster and consumes mUUCH less battery life form notebook. But i'd say it's less secure because of that... doesn't offer hidden partitions as far as I can remember and I had problems with getting it to work on some windows machines (but the OS was NLIGHTed so possibly because of that..)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FreeOTFE does something a bit different as far as i can remember. It does not encrypte the file itself but the data about the file in the MFT or FAT table&#8230; It is waaay faster and consumes mUUCH less battery life form notebook. But i&#8217;d say it&#8217;s less secure because of that&#8230; doesn&#8217;t offer hidden partitions as far as I can remember and I had problems with getting it to work on some windows machines (but the OS was NLIGHTed so possibly because of that..)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ahri</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1724</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1724</guid>
					<description>I found that encfs (a FUSE application) was easier to use, and you're not limited by the rather annoying startup hinderance; "how big do I make my encrypted partition?".

http://www.arg0.net/encfs allows you to mount an encrypted filesystem in userspace and just add stuff on the fly; the only limit is the size of the partition under which you're hosting the encrypted files.

Having said that I use TrueCrypt all the time in Windows, so I suppose it's a matter of taste. TrueCrypt *may* be faster, too, although I have no benchmarks to prove that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that encfs (a FUSE application) was easier to use, and you&#8217;re not limited by the rather annoying startup hinderance; &#8220;how big do I make my encrypted partition?&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.arg0.net/encfs" rel="nofollow">http://www.arg0.net/encfs</a> allows you to mount an encrypted filesystem in userspace and just add stuff on the fly; the only limit is the size of the partition under which you&#8217;re hosting the encrypted files.</p>
<p>Having said that I use TrueCrypt all the time in Windows, so I suppose it&#8217;s a matter of taste. TrueCrypt *may* be faster, too, although I have no benchmarks to prove that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mhelander</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1721</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 06:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1721</guid>
					<description>If traveling a lot, why not install [K]ubuntu[-8.04] with optional dm-crypt/luks/aes256 encryption from alternate install media ?

Works right from the box, related information has been available sans 2002 (albeit _much_ more complicated).

And you can use same encryption scheme to portable storage and GUI (both Gnome and KDE in Kubuntu-8.04) recognized those and prompt for password prior to mounting.

FreeOTFE  provides Windows software to share these encrypted medias with Windows (haven't tried that personally).

Cheers,
-Mika</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If traveling a lot, why not install [K]ubuntu[-8.04] with optional dm-crypt/luks/aes256 encryption from alternate install media ?</p>
<p>Works right from the box, related information has been available sans 2002 (albeit _much_ more complicated).</p>
<p>And you can use same encryption scheme to portable storage and GUI (both Gnome and KDE in Kubuntu-8.04) recognized those and prompt for password prior to mounting.</p>
<p>FreeOTFE  provides Windows software to share these encrypted medias with Windows (haven&#8217;t tried that personally).</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
-Mika
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hennie Briel</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1720</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1720</guid>
					<description>Yes. I share data between vista and kubuntu. No problem.
Great application!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I share data between vista and kubuntu. No problem.<br />
Great application!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: shekharc</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1719</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 04:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1719</guid>
					<description>sorry but I have a question. What if I upgrade the OS or change the OS?! Will I still be able to access my encrypted data on the drive and will be able to decrypt it?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry but I have a question. What if I upgrade the OS or change the OS?! Will I still be able to access my encrypted data on the drive and will be able to decrypt it?!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bruce Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1718</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7177/#comment-1718</guid>
					<description>Well I gave this a try and I keep getting prompted for an 'administrator password' when none has been set up. Wasn't even asked to set one up and cannot find where to add one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I gave this a try and I keep getting prompted for an &#8216;administrator password&#8217; when none has been set up. Wasn&#8217;t even asked to set one up and cannot find where to add one.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
