<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Filenames by Design, Part Three</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7194/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7194/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdos</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7194/#comment-5872</link>
		<dc:creator>mdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7194/#comment-5872</guid>
		<description>Nice series, though I don&#039;t know how many of us are using zsh. I&#039;m sure many of us are struggling with a large and growing pile of digital photos. I generally batch rename based on exif info and file the pics into directories based on date before archiving. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My issue is tagging. I&#039;d like to know which pictures &#039;Bob&#039; and &#039;Carol&#039; are in, or which pictures were taken in Italy, or which pictures were from my son&#039;s birthday party. This is where I see a DB coming in handy. A flat file is also fine, perhaps one in each directory containing a line for each photo consisting of the filename followed by a set of tags or keywords. If I want to find the pics with &#039;Bob&#039; in them, just iterate through the directories, grep through the tag file in each, and output the filenames that match. Certainly not as quick as a DB, but easy to maintain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can see this growing into a nice little set of scripts that run reports and tell you which pictures have yet to be tagged, generates a list of currently used tags and their frequencies, etc. It&#039;d be cool to be able to put a copy of all the photos I&#039;ve taken of my sister in law on a Sunday between 1pm and 3pm into a directory with one command.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually going through my entire collection and creating this tag DB is another story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice series, though I don&#8217;t know how many of us are using zsh. I&#8217;m sure many of us are struggling with a large and growing pile of digital photos. I generally batch rename based on exif info and file the pics into directories based on date before archiving. </p>
<p>My issue is tagging. I&#8217;d like to know which pictures &#8216;Bob&#8217; and &#8216;Carol&#8217; are in, or which pictures were taken in Italy, or which pictures were from my son&#8217;s birthday party. This is where I see a DB coming in handy. A flat file is also fine, perhaps one in each directory containing a line for each photo consisting of the filename followed by a set of tags or keywords. If I want to find the pics with &#8216;Bob&#8217; in them, just iterate through the directories, grep through the tag file in each, and output the filenames that match. Certainly not as quick as a DB, but easy to maintain.</p>
<p>I can see this growing into a nice little set of scripts that run reports and tell you which pictures have yet to be tagged, generates a list of currently used tags and their frequencies, etc. It&#8217;d be cool to be able to put a copy of all the photos I&#8217;ve taken of my sister in law on a Sunday between 1pm and 3pm into a directory with one command.</p>
<p>Actually going through my entire collection and creating this tag DB is another story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlong</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7194/#comment-5873</link>
		<dc:creator>tlong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7194/#comment-5873</guid>
		<description>I gave up on bash long ago, in favor of zsh. First got aquainted with it in 4.2 BSD, and now I use it on all my UNIX boxes. Just too many uber-cool features to ignore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave up on bash long ago, in favor of zsh. First got aquainted with it in 4.2 BSD, and now I use it on all my UNIX boxes. Just too many uber-cool features to ignore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>