<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Old Ethernet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7253/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7253/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgoglin</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7253/#comment-6192</link>
		<dc:creator>bgoglin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7253/#comment-6192</guid>
		<description>If you were using Open-MX over a 1500 bytes MTU fabric, Open-MX 1.1 (expected within a month) will be much better there. The current (Open-MX 1.0.x) support for MTU=1500 was very simple and certainly not optimized for performance. Please stay tuned :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were using Open-MX over a 1500 bytes MTU fabric, Open-MX 1.1 (expected within a month) will be much better there. The current (Open-MX 1.0.x) support for MTU=1500 was very simple and certainly not optimized for performance. Please stay tuned :)</p>
<p>Brice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>