Taking Microsoft’s Hyper-V R2 for a Spin

Is Microsoft's latest Hyper-V incarnation track-ready? We take it for a spin to find out.

I’m taking a short hiatus from the portable hypervisor series to bring you up to speed on Microsoft’s Hyper-V R2 hypervisor software. Upon first glance, Hyper-V R2 (R2) looks and feels the same as R1 does. This provides comfort to those who’ve already adopted the technology and know their way around it. Hyper-V didn’t receive a new paint job, new grille or tail lights but it has some interesting new improvements under the hood that might make competitors take a look in their rear view mirror and not see Microsoft trailing behind.

Though Hyper-V is supposed to be a Type 1 hypervisor; I installed Windows Server 2008 first and then installed Hyper-V as a role. In general, this type of installation is defined as a Type 2 hypervisor.

Kicking the Tires

From the beginning to the end (Including obligatory reboots), the installation process took about an hour. Installation began with the standard Windows Server 2008, which included booting from CD, partitioning, copying files, changing the initial Administrator password and configuring network settings. Next, Hyper-V services were installed as a role via the Server Manager. After two reboots, Hyper-V is installed and ready to begin life as a virtual machine host. Once installed you’ll need to update your system by activating your copy and allowing Windows updates to download and install. If you’re impatient, your system is ready for virtual machines as soon as you open Hyper-V Manager.

The Virtual Showroom

Live migration is an impressive new feature of R2 where you can migrate live VMs to another physical system. Processor architecture for migration can be different generations within the same manufacturer. This means that Intel to Intel migrations are allowed but Intel to AMD migrations are not. Live migration is good for balancing VM loads and performing maintenance during planned downtimes.

High Availability is a feature implemented to solve the unplanned downtime interruptions and service losses. Management tools for both of these features are available for Windows 7 (Don’t kill the messenger).

Under the R2 Hood

  • Live Migration
  • High Availability
  • Hot Add/Remove Virtual Storage
  • 10Gb/E Ready
  • Better Network Performance
  • Greater VM Density

Hot Add/Remove virtual storage is the solution many were anticipating for this release. The ability to add storage to a system without first bringing it down is required of a true enterprise-capable solution.

R2 carries high-end networking to the next level with its 10Gb/E readiness. This technology coupled with the new increased network performance and remoting make the idea of virtual desktops a near-future reality.

Microsoft also claims greater VM density per virtual host—up to 384 running VMs or up to 512 virtual processors. I’m skeptical of that one but theoretical numbers are just that, theoretical. I’d be thrilled to see 100 VMs per virtual host as a practical upper limit.

Hypervisor Definition

  • Type 1: A Type 1 hypervisor is also referred to as a bare metal hypervisor. This type of hypervisor might or might not include a Domain0 or primary virtual machine (VM) operating system with which to interact.
  • Type 2: This type of hypervisor is installed and runs as an application inside an operating system. The operating system is not a virtual machine.

Test Drive

My personal test drive of R2 was limited to the few days between its release and this writing but in that short span of time, I find that I like R2. I can’t say that it’s all that much different for me than R1. I’m happy that Microsoft made the enhancements and are continuing Hyper-V’s development. I did notice some speed improvements over R1 when installing new VMs. Startup seems faster and VM creation only takes a few seconds—even for an 8GB virtual disk.

Microsoft also claims to have improved the speed of using dynamically expanding virtual hard disks by 87%. Though they’re not recommended, this improvement might have some of your migrating right away. With the virtual storage Hot Add/Remove feature, I assume this is a temporary enhancement to be deprecated in some future release.

You won’t experience any sticker shock with Hyper-V because, like its open source counterparts, it’s free. If R2 lives up to its hype, it should give some of the other entrenched technologies a run for their money. Yes, Hyper-V still has a little ways to go before it’s a VMware killer but it’s well on the way. Given a couple of years and some good user feedback, the winner between Hyper-V and other hypervisors might be a photo finish.

Comments on "Taking Microsoft’s Hyper-V R2 for a Spin"


Please stop using the terms \”Type 1\” and \”Type 2\” to delineate different hyervisors. This terminology is very misleading and the definition that you give in your article contradicts itself:
\”Type 2: This type of hypervisor is installed and runs as an application inside an operating system. The operating system is not a virtual machine.\”
Q: What is Hyper-V Server then? You don\’t install Hyper-V Server as an application inside an operating system …….

For more discussion on why the Type 1/2 delineation is simply blurry:

Christoph Wegener


Actually, Christoph, this is one of the major points of contention that I have with Hyper-V. There is a product called Hyper-V Server that is a standalone ISO that installs itself to a bare-metal system.
However, if you, like I did, install Windows Server 2008 first, then install Hyper-V, it (Hyper-V) is listed there with IIS, DNS Server, Active Directory, etc. as a role. This leads one, maybe it\’s just me, to believe that adding virtualization services to this system is like adding IIS–just a service.

I know that Hyper-V is a Type-1 hypervisor. I know this. I was just saying that once you have Windows Server 2008 already installed, it looks as if you are just installing services that allow you to run VMs.

If instead, that it truly changes the kernel and changes the Windows 2008 Server to a paravirtualized Domain0, then it should not be a \’role\’ to be installed along with IIS, AD, etc.
There should, instead, be an option within Server Manager that is:
Convert This System to a Hyper-V Server.
That would be less misleading.

I know that the distinction is blurry, which is why I wrote what I did and it is made more blurry by the way Hyper-V is installed on an existing system. It appears that you are simply adding services which you can see in Computer Manager under Services.

I have had this discussion with someone from MS who read the post and wrote me about it. I\’ve also had this discussion with another tech writer who wanted me to change my second paragraph. But the correction doesn\’t need to come from my side–it needs to come from Microsoft.
To me, it isn\’t clear that when you add the Hyper-V role in Windows Server 2008, that you aren\’t just adding services. Rebooting doesn\’t convince me because you have to reboot MS systems if you change the system name.

So, to Microsoft: Clarify this conversion by moving it from Roles to some other place in Server Manager.

Great, thanks for sharing this blog post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

I have been examinating out many of your posts and i can claim nice stuff. I will definitely bookmark your website.

Very good blog post.Really looking forward to read more.

OZjWUS Major thankies for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.

Always a significant fan of linking to bloggers that I like but do not get a great deal of link enjoy from.

Really appreciate you sharing this blog post.Thanks Again. Will read on…

“My partner and I stumbled over here from a different web address and thought I might as well check things out. I like what I see so i am just following you. Look forward to checking out your web page yet again.”

Keep this going please, great job!

nice post,it is useful to me and others,please just keep it on….
Wholesale 68205a Oakley Sunglasses ID8210216 http://www.fleetsale.ru/new-arrival-oakleys-236.html

veH41J qlslwjkjybce, [url=http://tyzhrinvsxuo.com/]tyzhrinvsxuo[/url], [link=http://scbthpphmasv.com/]scbthpphmasv[/link], http://hffcmkqfwffk.com/

We prefer to honor numerous other world-wide-web sites around the web, even when they aren?t linked to us, by linking to them. Below are some webpages worth checking out.

Very few web sites that come about to become detailed beneath, from our point of view are undoubtedly nicely worth checking out.

Leave a Reply