<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Storage Trends From SuperComputing 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7627/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7627/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe landman</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7627/#comment-7466</link>
		<dc:creator>joe landman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7627/#comment-7466</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the coverage! I should point out a few things ... we demoed the kdb+ application on our machine from Kx (http://www.kx.com).  This application performed queries against large quote and tick data sets.  Much thanks to Kx for helping us get this set up and working!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We also showed some baseline runs on the machine there, and we had previously reported (http://scalability.org/?p=1706) a sustained 2.5GB/s read and write for 128 GB sized files (much larger than memory).  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We also (accidentally stealthily, was supposed to be unstealthily) announced our siCluster product.  We should de-cloak that correctly (it went into the SC09 press release black hole).  Think herds of tremendously fast machines pushing data out over huge pipes (http://scalability.org/?p=1980).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was a good show for us, and for the other partners in the Intel partner booth.  iX had some nice SSD systems showing off IOP monster systems.  Many others had nice focused displays.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again, thanks for the coverage!
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the coverage! I should point out a few things &#8230; we demoed the kdb+ application on our machine from Kx (<a href="http://www.kx.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.kx.com</a>).  This application performed queries against large quote and tick data sets.  Much thanks to Kx for helping us get this set up and working!</p>
<p>We also showed some baseline runs on the machine there, and we had previously reported (<a href="http://scalability.org/?p=1706" rel="nofollow">http://scalability.org/?p=1706</a>) a sustained 2.5GB/s read and write for 128 GB sized files (much larger than memory).  </p>
<p>We also (accidentally stealthily, was supposed to be unstealthily) announced our siCluster product.  We should de-cloak that correctly (it went into the SC09 press release black hole).  Think herds of tremendously fast machines pushing data out over huge pipes (<a href="http://scalability.org/?p=1980" rel="nofollow">http://scalability.org/?p=1980</a>).</p>
<p>This was a good show for us, and for the other partners in the Intel partner booth.  iX had some nice SSD systems showing off IOP monster systems.  Many others had nice focused displays.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for the coverage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>