<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disk-O-Tech: Linux Disk Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ypyxwqxp</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-142731</link>
		<dc:creator>ypyxwqxp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-142731</guid>
		<description>64s7i5  &lt;a href=&quot;http://qgfmeqemtiuy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;qgfmeqemtiuy&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>64s7i5  <a href="http://qgfmeqemtiuy.com/" rel="nofollow">qgfmeqemtiuy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafaela</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-142675</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafaela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-142675</guid>
		<description>The live CD or USB must be of the same arhcitecture (32 or 64 bits) of the installed OS; otherwise you will get an horrible error (which I can&#8217;t remember now) at the command chroot..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The live CD or USB must be of the same arhcitecture (32 or 64 bits) of the installed OS; otherwise you will get an horrible error (which I can&#8217;t remember now) at the command chroot..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheap links of london charms</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-73471</link>
		<dc:creator>cheap links of london charms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-73471</guid>
		<description>You are in reality a just right webmaster. The web site loading pace is amazing. It kind of feels that you are doing any unique trick. Moreover, The contents are masterpiece. you&#039;ve performed a wonderful task on this matter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are in reality a just right webmaster. The web site loading pace is amazing. It kind of feels that you are doing any unique trick. Moreover, The contents are masterpiece. you&#8217;ve performed a wonderful task on this matter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwains</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7744</link>
		<dc:creator>dwains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7744</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;\&quot;cfdisk\&quot; found on many distros is a much easier to use tool than fdisk.  Use it if it is available.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>\&#8221;cfdisk\&#8221; found on many distros is a much easier to use tool than fdisk.  Use it if it is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khess</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7745</link>
		<dc:creator>khess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7745</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;cfdisk is a good utility. It all depends on what you like. Some people like vi, others hate it. I prefer fdisk because that\&#039;s what I\&#039;m used to from the early days of Linux when that was \&#039;the\&#039; utility for modifying disk partitions.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cfdisk is a good utility. It all depends on what you like. Some people like vi, others hate it. I prefer fdisk because that\&#8217;s what I\&#8217;m used to from the early days of Linux when that was \&#8217;the\&#8217; utility for modifying disk partitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: here2serve</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7746</link>
		<dc:creator>here2serve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7746</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice but please back up fstab first and normally you should not create a new directory in root. Put the mount point in /mnt/back...
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice but please back up fstab first and normally you should not create a new directory in root. Put the mount point in /mnt/back&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viralnexxus</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7747</link>
		<dc:creator>viralnexxus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7747</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@here2serve&lt;br /&gt;
Good lookin out there!  I can\&#039;t tell you how many times I have screwed up and wished I had backed it up.  I learned the hard way... Cool article too btw.&lt;br /&gt;
Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;
-VB
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@here2serve<br />
Good lookin out there!  I can\&#8217;t tell you how many times I have screwed up and wished I had backed it up.  I learned the hard way&#8230; Cool article too btw.<br />
Cheers,<br />
-VB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aotto</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7748</link>
		<dc:creator>aotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7748</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When adding a new disk, it\&#039;s fine to run mount manually, as shown above with:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;debian:~# mount /dev/hda1 /backup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But if you add it to fstab later as suggested, you are assuming that it will mount when you reboot. You probably don\&#039;t want to reboot just to verify if it remounts the way you expect it to. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a better way. You can unmount it, and then test it using the fstab entry:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;debian:~# cd /&lt;br /&gt;
debian:~# umount /backup&lt;br /&gt;
debian:~# mount /backup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This will cause the mount command to consult the fstab entry for how to  mount the partition. This way if you have any problems with your fstab entry you find it before you try a reboot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--Adrian
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When adding a new disk, it\&#8217;s fine to run mount manually, as shown above with:</p>
<p>debian:~# mount /dev/hda1 /backup</p>
<p>But if you add it to fstab later as suggested, you are assuming that it will mount when you reboot. You probably don\&#8217;t want to reboot just to verify if it remounts the way you expect it to. </p>
<p>There is a better way. You can unmount it, and then test it using the fstab entry:</p>
<p>debian:~# cd /<br />
debian:~# umount /backup<br />
debian:~# mount /backup</p>
<p>This will cause the mount command to consult the fstab entry for how to  mount the partition. This way if you have any problems with your fstab entry you find it before you try a reboot.</p>
<p>&#8211;Adrian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shreedhan</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7749</link>
		<dc:creator>shreedhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7749</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I usually use gparted. The graphical mode is simple and easy. And you wouldn\&#039;t need to worry that you mistakenly selected a wrong disk or partition in the command line.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually use gparted. The graphical mode is simple and easy. And you wouldn\&#8217;t need to worry that you mistakenly selected a wrong disk or partition in the command line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khess</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7750</link>
		<dc:creator>khess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7750</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, you should always make backups but the echo addition method is the safest for adding since it alleviates editor anomalies. You can also do an umount /backup and then do a mount -a to test your mounts. Rebooting is the true acid test though. I\&#039;m not sure why *nix people have such an aversion to rebooting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just like fdisk. It\&#039;s quick and I\&#039;ve never blown away the wrong disk or partition in it (knock wood) because I use the \&#039;p\&#039; (print) command after I do anything. If you don\&#039;t write to disk with \&#039;w\&#039; then you\&#039;ve made no changes so it\&#039;s pretty safe. Like all things in *nix systems, you have to be careful because the system assumes you know what you\&#039;re doing when you do it.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you should always make backups but the echo addition method is the safest for adding since it alleviates editor anomalies. You can also do an umount /backup and then do a mount -a to test your mounts. Rebooting is the true acid test though. I\&#8217;m not sure why *nix people have such an aversion to rebooting.</p>
<p>I just like fdisk. It\&#8217;s quick and I\&#8217;ve never blown away the wrong disk or partition in it (knock wood) because I use the \&#8217;p\&#8217; (print) command after I do anything. If you don\&#8217;t write to disk with \&#8217;w\&#8217; then you\&#8217;ve made no changes so it\&#8217;s pretty safe. Like all things in *nix systems, you have to be careful because the system assumes you know what you\&#8217;re doing when you do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssbrshei</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7751</link>
		<dc:creator>ssbrshei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7751</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Using \&#039;mount -a\&#039; here is probably not ideal in this situation.  According to the man page:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;      mount -a [-t type] [-O optlist]&lt;br /&gt;
  (usually given in a bootscript) causes all file systems mentioned in fstab (of the proper type and/or having or not having the proper options) to be mounted  as  indicated, ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means it will try to remount the already mounted file systems again.  Probably not fatal but usually I try to avoid this whenever possible.  Since you already added the entry, /backup, to the fstab, it\&#039;s safer just to do (just like aotto has pointed out):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;     (cd away from /backup if you were there)&lt;br /&gt;
     umount /backup&lt;br /&gt;
     mount /backup&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also you might also want to mention -L (to specify a disk label) or -U (to give a uuid) when making filesystem.  This way, you don\&#039;t have to specify partition in fstab:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;     # mkfs.ext3 -L/backup /dev/hdb1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and in your fstab&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;     LABEL=/backup    /backup   ext3  defaults   0 2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the article.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using \&#8217;mount -a\&#8217; here is probably not ideal in this situation.  According to the man page:</p>
<p>      mount -a [-t type] [-O optlist]<br />
  (usually given in a bootscript) causes all file systems mentioned in fstab (of the proper type and/or having or not having the proper options) to be mounted  as  indicated, &#8230;</p>
<p>This means it will try to remount the already mounted file systems again.  Probably not fatal but usually I try to avoid this whenever possible.  Since you already added the entry, /backup, to the fstab, it\&#8217;s safer just to do (just like aotto has pointed out):</p>
<p>     (cd away from /backup if you were there)<br />
     umount /backup<br />
     mount /backup</p>
<p>Also you might also want to mention -L (to specify a disk label) or -U (to give a uuid) when making filesystem.  This way, you don\&#8217;t have to specify partition in fstab:</p>
<p>     # mkfs.ext3 -L/backup /dev/hdb1</p>
<p>and in your fstab</p>
<p>     LABEL=/backup    /backup   ext3  defaults   0 2</p>
<p>Thanks for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grdetil</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7752</link>
		<dc:creator>grdetil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7752</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As ssbrshei suggested, using volume labels is a good idea.  If you don\&#039;t add it to the mkfs command, you can always add it later with the e2label command.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I\&#039;ve never had a problem with \&quot;mount -a\&quot; trying to remount already mounted filesystems.  It\&#039;s smart enough to check what\&#039;s mounted, and only mounts what\&#039;s not already there.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As ssbrshei suggested, using volume labels is a good idea.  If you don\&#8217;t add it to the mkfs command, you can always add it later with the e2label command.</p>
<p>But I\&#8217;ve never had a problem with \&#8221;mount -a\&#8221; trying to remount already mounted filesystems.  It\&#8217;s smart enough to check what\&#8217;s mounted, and only mounts what\&#8217;s not already there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porridge</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7753</link>
		<dc:creator>porridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7753</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You better make sure that fstab ends with a newline before you append do it...
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You better make sure that fstab ends with a newline before you append do it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikerjohnson</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7754</link>
		<dc:creator>mikerjohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7754</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I would recommend anyone reading this to seriously evaluate using LVM over a plain partition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, echoing ssbrshei and grdetil, use either a label or uuid in the fstab.  Do not put an entry in the fstab using the /dev/&lt;drive&gt; format.  While it may not come back to bite you, it just might.  Consider that if you add a second partition, then delete the first, your partitions just re-enumerated.  What if you decided to move your hard drive to a different controller?  Now your drives are enumerated differently.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you use labels, LVM or UUID, changing the partition table or moving drives around won\&#039;t break things.  At this point IMO, it is bad practice to setup persistent mounts using a dev path.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would recommend anyone reading this to seriously evaluate using LVM over a plain partition.</p>
<p>Additionally, echoing ssbrshei and grdetil, use either a label or uuid in the fstab.  Do not put an entry in the fstab using the /dev/&lt;drive&gt; format.  While it may not come back to bite you, it just might.  Consider that if you add a second partition, then delete the first, your partitions just re-enumerated.  What if you decided to move your hard drive to a different controller?  Now your drives are enumerated differently.</p>
<p>If you use labels, LVM or UUID, changing the partition table or moving drives around won\&#8217;t break things.  At this point IMO, it is bad practice to setup persistent mounts using a dev path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poloi</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7755</link>
		<dc:creator>poloi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7755</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;vi may be boring but imagine&lt;br /&gt;
echo \&quot;/dev/hda1    /backup   ext3   defaults    0    2\&quot; &gt; /etc/fstab&lt;br /&gt;
rather than&lt;br /&gt;
echo \&quot;/dev/hda1    /backup   ext3   defaults    0    2\&quot; &gt;&gt; /etc/fstab
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vi may be boring but imagine<br />
echo \&#8221;/dev/hda1    /backup   ext3   defaults    0    2\&#8221; &gt; /etc/fstab<br />
rather than<br />
echo \&#8221;/dev/hda1    /backup   ext3   defaults    0    2\&#8221; &gt;&gt; /etc/fstab</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bendib</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7756</link>
		<dc:creator>bendib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7756</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Did you REALLY think adding a disk was hard? I use GParted myself, by the way.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you REALLY think adding a disk was hard? I use GParted myself, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linuxfan62</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7757</link>
		<dc:creator>linuxfan62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7757</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the detailed article.  I learned something from it and also from the comments, i.e. how to check an fstab entry without rebooting.  I use the simple gedit to edit fstab. \&quot;gksudo gedit /etc/fstab\&quot;.  Now that people who haven\&#039;t yet added a 2nd drive to their systems know the complicated way to do it, will you, or anyone, write a followup on how to do it with GParted, which is the simple way to do it?  It allows creating drive Labels as well.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the detailed article.  I learned something from it and also from the comments, i.e. how to check an fstab entry without rebooting.  I use the simple gedit to edit fstab. \&#8221;gksudo gedit /etc/fstab\&#8221;.  Now that people who haven\&#8217;t yet added a 2nd drive to their systems know the complicated way to do it, will you, or anyone, write a followup on how to do it with GParted, which is the simple way to do it?  It allows creating drive Labels as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idknow</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7758</link>
		<dc:creator>idknow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7758</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Folks;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since we\&#039;re sharing our collective knowledge on installing fixed disks and what not, here\&#039;s mine. (not in strict operational order)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A. ca. Summer 2009, I began using Xfs on my critical fs; not one hiccup since then; on my next distribution install I\&#039;ll be using Xfs exclusively;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;B. After I\&#039;ve defined a new partition, my habit has been to run uuid and whatever applicable partition-info tool a fs provides and write that info to the newly-defined partition as /.uuid.&lt;OEM-name&gt; and /.info.&lt;OEM-name&gt;; for instance, when I purchase a new Western-Digital disk, those filenames being with WD and I append its model name.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;C. IMHO having multiple disks in a computer\&#039;s box can prevent a lot of headaches; for years I\&#039;ve designated the first installed disk as the primary distro-boot-root disk: to that disk I install all the distribution\&#039;s files to it exclusively; I break out /usr/local, /var and /home to partitions on other disks for non-distro-installed files and packages that must survive across any upgrade or refresh of the distro I use.  Also, I usually define a swap partition on each new disk but that\&#039;s not a rule written in stone;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Stay well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-- idknow.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Folks;</p>
<p>Since we\&#8217;re sharing our collective knowledge on installing fixed disks and what not, here\&#8217;s mine. (not in strict operational order)</p>
<p>A. ca. Summer 2009, I began using Xfs on my critical fs; not one hiccup since then; on my next distribution install I\&#8217;ll be using Xfs exclusively;</p>
<p>B. After I\&#8217;ve defined a new partition, my habit has been to run uuid and whatever applicable partition-info tool a fs provides and write that info to the newly-defined partition as /.uuid.&lt;OEM-name&gt; and /.info.&lt;OEM-name&gt;; for instance, when I purchase a new Western-Digital disk, those filenames being with WD and I append its model name.</p>
<p>C. IMHO having multiple disks in a computer\&#8217;s box can prevent a lot of headaches; for years I\&#8217;ve designated the first installed disk as the primary distro-boot-root disk: to that disk I install all the distribution\&#8217;s files to it exclusively; I break out /usr/local, /var and /home to partitions on other disks for non-distro-installed files and packages that must survive across any upgrade or refresh of the distro I use.  Also, I usually define a swap partition on each new disk but that\&#8217;s not a rule written in stone;</p>
<p> Stay well.</p>
<p>&#8211; idknow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverwave</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7759</link>
		<dc:creator>silverwave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7683/#comment-7759</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you have a gui then GParted is the way to go. It has never let me down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just use a liveCD.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The posted cli process is a good refresher though.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a gui then GParted is the way to go. It has never let me down.</p>
<p>I just use a liveCD.</p>
<p>The posted cli process is a good refresher though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>