<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tools for Storage Monitoring: nfsiostat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7919/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7919/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddenton</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7919/#comment-9583</link>
		<dc:creator>ddenton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/?p=7919#comment-9583</guid>
		<description>On my RHEL5 system, I have two fields before the read and write details which include &quot;op/s&quot; and &quot;rpc bklog&quot;. The latter I&#039;m clear on, but can anyone help me differentiate between the &quot;op/s&quot; fields and the &quot;ops/s&quot; fields included in the read and write figures? I would have assumed the field in question is a total of the read and write figures for that mount point, but the math doesn&#039;t always add up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my RHEL5 system, I have two fields before the read and write details which include &#8220;op/s&#8221; and &#8220;rpc bklog&#8221;. The latter I&#8217;m clear on, but can anyone help me differentiate between the &#8220;op/s&#8221; fields and the &#8220;ops/s&#8221; fields included in the read and write figures? I would have assumed the field in question is a total of the read and write figures for that mount point, but the math doesn&#8217;t always add up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bramp</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7919/#comment-9020</link>
		<dc:creator>bramp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 04:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/?p=7919#comment-9020</guid>
		<description>It is available in Debian testing (package version 9.1.x), but not in Debian Squeeze (which only has package version 9.0.x).

Looks like you have to update to testing, or use pinning. Or just compile it yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is available in Debian testing (package version 9.1.x), but not in Debian Squeeze (which only has package version 9.0.x).</p>
<p>Looks like you have to update to testing, or use pinning. Or just compile it yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmanaus</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7919/#comment-9018</link>
		<dc:creator>webmanaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 21:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/?p=7919#comment-9018</guid>
		<description>Silly question, but the sysstat package on debian doesn&#039;t include nfsiostat, and in fact there is no package version of it AFAICT. Does anyone know if there is in fact a packaged version of it, or what happened to it?
Thanks, looks like a great article, I&#039;m certainly looking forward to more. I&#039;ve been interested in improving performance of my NFS servers for a very long time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly question, but the sysstat package on debian doesn&#8217;t include nfsiostat, and in fact there is no package version of it AFAICT. Does anyone know if there is in fact a packaged version of it, or what happened to it?<br />
Thanks, looks like a great article, I&#8217;m certainly looking forward to more. I&#8217;ve been interested in improving performance of my NFS servers for a very long time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier Lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7919/#comment-9017</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/?p=7919#comment-9017</guid>
		<description>Good article to continue with the storage monitoring series.

I am curious about the numbers reported, because they seem pretty high (up to 19616400 wkB_svr/s i.e. 19 GB/s). What type of NFS server was used?

It would be also interesting to know your opinion about the output of nfsiostat: wkB_svr/s is related to wBlk_nor/s and wkB_svr/s continues for a while after wBlk_nor/s has gone down to zero. Is it due to client buffers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article to continue with the storage monitoring series.</p>
<p>I am curious about the numbers reported, because they seem pretty high (up to 19616400 wkB_svr/s i.e. 19 GB/s). What type of NFS server was used?</p>
<p>It would be also interesting to know your opinion about the output of nfsiostat: wkB_svr/s is related to wBlk_nor/s and wkB_svr/s continues for a while after wBlk_nor/s has gone down to zero. Is it due to client buffers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>