<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digging Into The Top500</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7922/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7922/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scemama</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7922/#comment-8772</link>
		<dc:creator>scemama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7922/#comment-8772</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;br /&gt;
here is an answer your question about who uses a large number of processors for one job:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stochastic methods are very well adapted to using thousands of processors since an unlimited number tasks can be run independently and asynchronously. In addition, fault-tolerance is easy to achieve: if one task doesn&#039;t transmit its output it affects only the error bar on the total result and not the average. These methods are quite frequent (namely in physics, chemistry, finance...) and will probably spread even more in the future due to its massively parallelizable property.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, this page shows an application of Quantum Monte Carlo&lt;br /&gt;
on the EGEE grid : http://qmcchem.ups-tlse.fr/index.php?title=Large-scale_quantum_Monte_Carlo_electronic_structure_calculations_on_the_EGEE_grid&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to grids, this code runs routinely on 512 cores (for a single calculation) with a nearly perfect speedup. It could run on much more if we could have access to more cores!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anthony
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
here is an answer your question about who uses a large number of processors for one job:</p>
<p>Stochastic methods are very well adapted to using thousands of processors since an unlimited number tasks can be run independently and asynchronously. In addition, fault-tolerance is easy to achieve: if one task doesn&#8217;t transmit its output it affects only the error bar on the total result and not the average. These methods are quite frequent (namely in physics, chemistry, finance&#8230;) and will probably spread even more in the future due to its massively parallelizable property.</p>
<p>For example, this page shows an application of Quantum Monte Carlo<br />
on the EGEE grid : <a href="http://qmcchem.ups-tlse.fr/index.php?title=Large-scale_quantum_Monte_Carlo_electronic_structure_calculations_on_the_EGEE_grid" rel="nofollow">http://qmcchem.ups-tlse.fr/index.php?title=Large-scale_quantum_Monte_Carlo_electronic_structure_calculations_on_the_EGEE_grid</a><br />
In addition to grids, this code runs routinely on 512 cores (for a single calculation) with a nearly perfect speedup. It could run on much more if we could have access to more cores!</p>
<p>Anthony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schandok</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7922/#comment-8773</link>
		<dc:creator>schandok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7922/#comment-8773</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice summary about on the direction HPC clusters are taking.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice summary about on the direction HPC clusters are taking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laytonjb</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7922/#comment-8774</link>
		<dc:creator>laytonjb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7922/#comment-8774</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@scemama,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think Doug is referring to a single application running on 128,000 cores using MPI. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jeff
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@scemama,</p>
<p>I think Doug is referring to a single application running on 128,000 cores using MPI. </p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solanum</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7922/#comment-8775</link>
		<dc:creator>solanum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7922/#comment-8775</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Boinc uses more then 128K cores. Their cluster just has some latency issues. :)
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boinc uses more then 128K cores. Their cluster just has some latency issues. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>