<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Distribution Developments in 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Open Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 13:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mishake</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-145173</link>
		<dc:creator>Mishake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-145173</guid>
		<description>Show!Tomara que esjtea mais est&#225;vel a 11.1.Valeu!Usando  Google Chrome 1.0.154.36 em  Windows XP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show!Tomara que esjtea mais est&aacute;vel a 11.1.Valeu!Usando  Google Chrome 1.0.154.36 em  Windows XP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maryalesia</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-9040</link>
		<dc:creator>maryalesia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 07:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-9040</guid>
		<description>Wait ... what are they planning on doing to my Ubuntu desktop? My wonderful, fully tricked out Ubuntu desktop that I love so much?? THEY WANT TO PUT THAT ON IT??????? 

I&#039;m freaking out. I&#039;m freaking out I&#039;m freaking out. I love Ubuntu. Oh so much. And I have problems with letting go - moving on - I cried when I switched browsers. That may not be healthy, but it&#039;s me. Switching operating systems is Extremely Difficult. This better not ruin things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait &#8230; what are they planning on doing to my Ubuntu desktop? My wonderful, fully tricked out Ubuntu desktop that I love so much?? THEY WANT TO PUT THAT ON IT??????? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m freaking out. I&#8217;m freaking out I&#8217;m freaking out. I love Ubuntu. Oh so much. And I have problems with letting go &#8211; moving on &#8211; I cried when I switched browsers. That may not be healthy, but it&#8217;s me. Switching operating systems is Extremely Difficult. This better not ruin things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: znmeb</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-8792</link>
		<dc:creator>znmeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-8792</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Or Oracle could just get really ambitious and try to buy Red Hat. Red Hat is a public company, after all — and if they could grab Sun, they could pony up the cash for Red Hat. It’s a very ugly thought, but Oracle is not a stranger to hostile takeovers. However, if Oracle were to try this, I suspect IBM and HP would get involved.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually, I was surprised that Attachmate ended up with Novell, not VMware, Oracle or IBM. But I think you&#039;re right - the major &quot;commercially successful&quot; Linux distros, for some definition of &quot;commercially successful&quot;, are ripe for hostile or not-so-hostile takeovers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do think, though, that the first to go would be Canonical / Ubuntu. It&#039;s anybody&#039;s guess who&#039;d get them, but I&#039;d think Google and HP were the most likely. I think IBM would be more likely to get Red Hat than either HP or Oracle, given that Red Hat HQ is in North Carolina a stone&#039;s throw from a huge IBM campus. Besides, Oracle already *has* a Linux distro - yet another RHEL rebuild-from-source like Scientific Linux or CentOS.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Or Oracle could just get really ambitious and try to buy Red Hat. Red Hat is a public company, after all — and if they could grab Sun, they could pony up the cash for Red Hat. It’s a very ugly thought, but Oracle is not a stranger to hostile takeovers. However, if Oracle were to try this, I suspect IBM and HP would get involved.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, I was surprised that Attachmate ended up with Novell, not VMware, Oracle or IBM. But I think you&#8217;re right &#8211; the major &#8220;commercially successful&#8221; Linux distros, for some definition of &#8220;commercially successful&#8221;, are ripe for hostile or not-so-hostile takeovers. </p>
<p>I do think, though, that the first to go would be Canonical / Ubuntu. It&#8217;s anybody&#8217;s guess who&#8217;d get them, but I&#8217;d think Google and HP were the most likely. I think IBM would be more likely to get Red Hat than either HP or Oracle, given that Red Hat HQ is in North Carolina a stone&#8217;s throw from a huge IBM campus. Besides, Oracle already *has* a Linux distro &#8211; yet another RHEL rebuild-from-source like Scientific Linux or CentOS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nackpere</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-8793</link>
		<dc:creator>nackpere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-8793</guid>
		<description>&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nackpere</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-8794</link>
		<dc:creator>nackpere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-8794</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s hoping that 2011 has some good things in store for FreeBSD as well.  It should be a good year with FreeBSD 9 and Clang/LLVM becoming the default compiler, a more current version of ZFS in the base system, improvements to Jails, etc.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s hoping that 2011 has some good things in store for FreeBSD as well.  It should be a good year with FreeBSD 9 and Clang/LLVM becoming the default compiler, a more current version of ZFS in the base system, improvements to Jails, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidmintz</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-8795</link>
		<dc:creator>davidmintz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-8795</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For us Ubuntu desktop fans, if Unity turns out to suck, bailing and turning to Mint instead sounds like it might be a good option.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For us Ubuntu desktop fans, if Unity turns out to suck, bailing and turning to Mint instead sounds like it might be a good option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franzel</title>
		<link>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-8796</link>
		<dc:creator>franzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7925/#comment-8796</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To 1. Ubuntu Chooses Unity:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For many years I have been a Ubuntu (gnome) user, but the announcement from Mr. Shuttleworth to switch to unity, show me to switch too. In linux you have the possibility to choose. I try Fedora und stop now at Linux Mint.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Franzel
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To 1. Ubuntu Chooses Unity:</p>
<p>For many years I have been a Ubuntu (gnome) user, but the announcement from Mr. Shuttleworth to switch to unity, show me to switch too. In linux you have the possibility to choose. I try Fedora und stop now at Linux Mint.</p>
<p>Franzel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>