Comments on: 2X ApplicationServer: Applications at the Speed of Cheap

By: Lennie Woode

Lennie Woode — Tue, 02 Apr 2013 09:01:25 +0000

An article directory may accept new articles from any contributor, but may require that a new article is unique (not published elsewhere) and not spun (see article spinning). A typical article is around 400-500 words, and tools such as a WYSIWYG editor for writing and submitting an article may be provided.`

Newest piece of writing coming from our new blog page
<'http://www.caramoantourpackage.com/caramoan-tour-package/

By: photographic memory

photographic memory — Mon, 02 Apr 2012 02:30:29 +0000

Hi my loved one! I want to say that this post is amazing, nice written and come with almost all important infos. I would like to peer more posts like this .

By: Chad Harper

Chad Harper — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:37:22 +0000

At my company, we’ve used the 2X Application Server and the 2X load Balancer since 2006 for application delivery and I’m quite pleased with it overall. Very easy to set up and administer and runs with little or no hands-on maintenance. The only negative going against 2X is the upgrade process is quite an issue. There is no consistency to whether the server side is backward compatible with clients, but I wouldn’t complain about that.

Overall great product and great service from 2X.

By: adf.ly

adf.ly — Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:32:38 +0000

Woah this blog is great i love reading your posts. Keep up the great paintings! You know, many individuals are hunting around for this info, you could aid them greatly.

By: best deal on Tvs

best deal on Tvs — Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:30:58 +0000

I liked as much as you’ll obtain performed proper here. The sketch is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. nevertheless, you command get got an edginess over that you want be delivering the following. sick no doubt come further before again as exactly the similar just about a lot incessantly within case you shield this hike.

By: movies

movies — Sun, 27 Nov 2011 03:43:59 +0000

Magnificent issues altogether, you just received a brand new reader. What may you suggest about your put up that you just made a few days ago? Any positive?

By: buy cheap proxies

buy cheap proxies — Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:59:31 +0000

Hello, i think that i noticed you visited my website so i came to go back the want?.I am attempting to in finding things to enhance my website!I assume its adequate to make use of a few of your ideas!!

By: dbaphomet

dbaphomet — Wed, 29 Jun 2011 01:49:02 +0000

That’s tight !

By: Ryan Faussett

Ryan Faussett — Mon, 02 May 2011 18:33:39 +0000

i think this is losing whatever was founded by the orginal article. I SWEAR anything related to do this, branched from a free project, either pxes or pxes2. I could be wrong, it could be a configurator only…. but they had stuff to even build your /tftpboot/ boot image. If it was a configurator thats fine, I’ll figure it out long hand :-D

By: yatescr

yatescr — Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:56:19 +0000

Or perhaps rather “X terminal (re: the old NCD devices) instead of “dum terminal”.

By: yatescr

yatescr — Sat, 30 Apr 2011 23:55:28 +0000

Isn’t the mechanism essentially equivalent to X11 for MS-Windows, and isn’t the implementation essentially like the old-school “dumb-terminal connected to a server farm” paradigm?

By: smastny

smastny — Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:39:09 +0000

I think a few of the other readers are reading too much into this.The point that I pulled out of this 2XAS article is for shops that are primarily Microsoft and have used Citrix for some of the remote applications, this is another alternative out there. The benefit though is a bit more control of the apps without exposing the whole environment. So for those like in the example Mr. Hess used, if IE is needed, just having the 2XAS client ready and with IE published, that is the only part that would be needed as opposed to the entire environment.

I know in our environment that would be useful because we’d have an App server and wouldn’t need non-beneficial client VMs running just so that a user on a Mac or *nix box can get to the one MS app that particular individual needed for their job. Thanks for the article, definitely an interesting alternative to Citrix.

By: ali_hanxala

ali_hanxala — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:59:52 +0000

Can we rake it as an alternate to WINE ??

By: lurah

lurah — Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:45:03 +0000

Citrix is well known because of the performance over minimum bandwidth. Have you compare how well 2X on this point of view ? Because I think why people still using Citrix is because of this. If the performance of 2X far beyond Citrix I think it is beter using rDesktop although it still force us to login to the OS first, but we don’t have to pay additional license to used it.

By: Ken Hess

Ken Hess — Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:48:26 +0000

Pricing: http://www.2x.com/ordering/pricing.html

By: Ken Hess

Ken Hess — Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:47:44 +0000

I’m not sure from where it branched, only that their software installs on WTS. 2X is a replacement for the expense and difficulty of Citrix.

By: Ken Hess

Ken Hess — Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:45:53 +0000

it isn’t a demo but you get three connections free. It’s not a deal breaker. A lot of companies use this model. Feel free to check out pricing and licensing on their website.

By: Ryan Faussett

Ryan Faussett — Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:16:03 +0000

“With no experience, you can download 2X ApplicationServer for Windows Terminal Services (2XAS) and publish applications within minutes.”

“Sure, you have to use Windows Terminal Services (WTS) but on the client side, you’re free to use Windows, Mac, and Linux. Now, you can satisfy the “corporate standard” by using Windows applications and satisfy your need to be free by using them on your Linux desktop.”

Don’t they have a Linux Terminal Server/service? Didn’t this branch off from PXES? What if you are fine with Open Office, Evolution and/or Thunderbird and don’t want to pay the per seat/head license for MS apps?

Is that possible or can you also review that portion of it as well.

By: jkohut

jkohut — Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:52:29 +0000

Yes, a little more information would be beneficial (i.e. pricing etc…). Not a bad article to get people familiar with the fact that the product exists. Thanks at least for that.

By: Lary Tobos

Lary Tobos — Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:10:59 +0000

I did not understand and you need to clarify, and I quote:
“This software allows three simultaneous connections.”

Is this a limitation of a free demo download, or not? For enterprise use, this would be a deal breaker !

Also, I would expect a few more words on the licensing, your info is rather vague to nonexistent.